Rolltide94
Well-Known Member
Unfortunately we’ll never know.
Nope, but we won't know if North Dakota St would beat Bama either, and I'm losing an equal amount of sleep over that.
Unfortunately we’ll never know.
Vegas put UCF as 21 pt underdogs.
Why aren't you crying about them?
I post about Alabama because I like Alabama. I think I'd honestly be a pretty sad puppy if I came to the hoop and someone wasn't crying about Alabama. It's kind of like bandwagon fans(INB4 you call me one...again), I consider them good because they only show up when you are winning.
You post about Alabama because you are butthurt. People who aren't butthurt don't post in these threads, they tend to avoid them. I LOVE poking butthurt people. Bunch of fucking pussies who can't handle reality, and I'm not just talking about college football. Nobody forces you to this, and even though I've laid this out for you in simple words, you will not be able to stop yourself - because you mad.
Nope, but we won't know if North Dakota St would beat Bama either, and I'm losing an equal amount of sleep over that.
I’m not cutting down Alabama. They had a great team (again), slid into the playoffs by the skin of their teeth (deservingly so in my personal opinion and also in the only opinion that matters, the committees’) and did what many of us largely expected them to do once they got there, battled through the playoff gauntlet and won the whole thing (again).
But where did you see that Vegas had the Tide -21 in some hypothetical, mythical match up of UCF versus Alabama keeping in mind that they never played the actual game? What that before or after the post season? Site your source.
Self-proclaimed unbeaten national champion UCF would be a 21-point underdog in a neutral site game vs. Alabama, according to Todd Fuhrman, a former oddsmaker at Caesars Palace and co-founder of Bet The Board podcast said Tuesday.
Ahh your favorite word, butthurt. That’s all you know plain and simple. It’s impossible to have a real conversation with you because everything has to involve Alabama in the right light. You simply can’t talk about anything else because you try so hard to defend alabama as if you are hiding some feelings about your fanhood.
You have got to be one of the biggest triggered pussies on this board because one way or another if something bad is said about bama, you are there high and mighty to defend a team you’ve never actually seen play. Then on top of that, anyone with a differing opinion is automatically butthurt. It’s what you do because again, you are a triggered pussy.
A real conversation about how UCF would beat Alabama by 21 pts?
A real conversation about how It’s not a forgone conclusion Alabama beats UCF, which you keep dismissing.
Obviously it’s not a forgone conclusion. Perfectly decent-good teams lose to FCS teams about every year for fuck’s sake. The likely outcome is it would have been a shitty NC game with Bama winning easily though.
You’d think, but this is SportsHoopla.You would think such things would go without saying.
If you were forced to bet your life savings, which team are you taking?
Yeah, now shut the fuck up.
You would think such things would go without saying.
Do you think that solves that you dumb fuck?
This is exactly what I’m talking about. You can’t have a real conversation if it’s not alabama being propped up. Jesus Christ man
Obviously it’s not a forgone conclusion. Perfectly decent-good teams lose to FCS teams about every year for fuck’s sake. The likely outcome is it would have been a shitty NC game with Bama winning easily though.
But anyone that doesn’t say those things is butthurt??
Well the title of the poll is:
What would've been the result of a Bama vs UCF title game?
Seems like it solves the question to me.
I'm pretty sure you aren't following the fake conversation.
It was after, as that was the only time anyone had interest in the match up.
Hypothetical betting line released for Alabama vs. UCF