deanpet21
Well-Known Member
NT Sylvester Williams is visiting today.
He should be a lot cheaper than hankins. Hankins is going to get paid b/c of his age.
NT Sylvester Williams is visiting today.
And Hankins is regarded as a better player at this point. Williams was cut to save just over $3 million for the season. That's not a sign that he was highly regarded. And even though he's light for a NT, he's not a factor as a pass rusher. Ya get what ya pay for. Williams seems to have hit his peak in 2015 - when he had several good moments in the post-season with Denver. Seems like Hankins is a real good player, while Williams would be an adequate place-holder.He should be a lot cheaper than hankins. Hankins is going to get paid b/c of his age.
Williams will cost about the same or a,little more than the Macboys but does he bring anything more to the table than them? Then why sign him?
We gotta get Hankins.
Just want the flexibility. What if Vea and Payne are gone by 13.
we are out of the hankins derby , but williams isnt anything we can use that is going to solve an issue . better off resigning taylor
i would resign taylor , if we get williams , he isnt better then what we haveDisagree.
Williams and Logan would be fairly big upgrades over Taylor
i would resign taylor , if we get williams , he isnt better then what we have
his play has deteriorated since then , beef is he doesnt get off blocks wellAgain I dont know if I agree.
Williams was a 1st round draft pick who, as I remember, was pretty damn good on a very impressive Broncos line.
I admit I have no idea how he performed last season or even care if it was 1 down year.
Probably the only thing I have confidence in regarding the redskins is Callahan and Tomsula