Alabama vs UCF

[ralphiewvu]

Sure they do, you just have the opinion they dont. Doesnt mean it has never happened nor does it mean it can never happen. Is it improbable, yes. Is it possible, absolutely. Good luck with that opinion.

It’s absolutely possible. But it just doesn’t happen. That’s my opinion fuck stick. It’s not that hard to understand.

 

[Bandwagonbo2]

I played in high school. I’m not going to lie and say it went beyond that because I actually went to the school I support. An your opinion isn’t a warped wrong ass opinion? Half the teams you quoted getting crushed had losing records. Enjoy being a fake ignorant twat waffle that has no common sense yet thinks losing 21-0 is the same as losing 50-0.

Is it a big L? If so, it is. I will let the comment about actually going to the school I support. Its not worth my time.

 

[Bandwagonbo2]

It’s absolutely possible. But it just doesn’t happen. That’s my opinion fuck stick. It’s not that hard to understand.

Finally admit its possible. Thats all that has been argued from the start. Top teams do lose big sometimes and I showed so in several cases. You failed to realize 31-0 and 21-0 are big losses and those teams were top team, didnt come back from them even if its possible to do so. Top teams do lose big. Its totally possible, no matter how improbable it is to happen.

 

[ralphiewvu]

Finally admit its possible. Thats all that has been argued from the start. Top teams do lose big sometimes and I showed so in several cases. You failed to realize 31-0 and 21-0 are big losses and those teams were top team, didnt come back from them even if its possible to do so. Top teams do lose big. Its totally possible, no matter how improbable it is to happen.

Several cases? You showed maybe 2 cases or less than 1%.

Of course it’s possible. But losing 21-0 or 31-0 isn’t the same as losing 50-0 and that’s my opinion. You obviously differ. This is all opinion based anyway.

 

[ralphiewvu]

Is it a big L? If so, it is. I will let the comment about actually going to the school I support. Its not worth my time.

I figured you would.

 

[Bandwagonbo2]

I figured you would.

Why wouldnt I, since I am a 2 time graduate of the University of Alabama.

 

[Bandwagonbo2]

Several cases? You showed maybe 2 cases or less than 1%.

Of course it’s possible. But losing 21-0 or 31-0 isn’t the same as losing 50-0 and that’s my opinion. You obviously differ. This is all opinion based anyway.

A W is a W and an L Is an L. Points dont really matter over the test of time except to people like you.

 

[PhilSimms11]

I would like to see the P5 and G5 have their own playoff, but if you were to take the P5 champions, highest ranked G5, and 2 at-larges I could live with that more than the 4-team playoff they have now.

2017
(1)Clemson (12-1) vs (8)UCF (12-0)
(4)*Alabama (11-1) vs (5)Ohio St (11-2)

(2)Oklahoma (12-1) vs (7)USC (11-2)
(3)Georgia (12-1) vs (6)*Wisconsin (12-1)
----------
2016
(1)Alabama (13-0) vs (8)Western Michigan (13-0)
(4)Washington (12-1) vs (5)Penn St (11-2)

(2)Clemson (12-1) vs (7)*Michigan (10-2)
(3)*Ohio St (11-1) vs (6)Oklahoma (10-2)
----------
2015
(1)Clemson (13-0) vs (8)Houston (12-1)
(4)Oklahoma (11-1) vs (5)*Iowa (12-1)

(2)Alabama (12-1) vs (7)*Ohio St (11-1)
(3)Michigan St (12-1) vs (6)Stanford (11-2)
----------
2014
(1)Alabama (12-1) vs (8)Boise St (11-2)
(4)Ohio St (12-1) vs (5)Baylor (11-1)

(2)Oregon (12-1) vs (7)*Mississippi St (10-2)
(3)Florida St (13-0) vs (6)*TCU (11-1)
(*)at-large

 

[4down20]

I would like to see the P5 and G5 have their own playoff, but if you were to take the P5 champions, highest ranked G5, and 2 at-larges I could live with that more than the 4-team playoff they have now.

2017
(1)Clemson (12-1) vs (8)UCF (12-0)
(4)*Alabama (11-1) vs (5)Ohio St (11-2)

(2)Oklahoma (12-1) vs (7)USC (11-2)
(3)Georgia (12-1) vs (6)*Wisconsin (12-1)
----------
2016
(1)Alabama (13-0) vs (8)Western Michigan (13-0)
(4)Washington (12-1) vs (5)Penn St (11-2)

(2)Clemson (12-1) vs (7)*Michigan (10-2)
(3)*Ohio St (11-1) vs (6)Oklahoma (10-2)
----------
2015
(1)Clemson (13-0) vs (8)Houston (12-1)
(4)Oklahoma (11-1) vs (5)*Iowa (12-1)

(2)Alabama (12-1) vs (7)*Ohio St (11-1)
(3)Michigan St (12-1) vs (6)Stanford (11-2)
----------
2014
(1)Alabama (12-1) vs (8)Boise St (11-2)
(4)Ohio St (12-1) vs (5)Baylor (11-1)

(2)Oregon (12-1) vs (7)*Mississippi St (10-2)
(3)Florida St (13-0) vs (6)*TCU (11-1)
(*)at-large

Look at all those shitty teams you put in the playoffs.

And still you hit the post reply button.

Amazing.

 

[PhilSimms11]

Look at all those shitty teams you put in the playoffs.

And still you hit the post reply button.

Amazing.

Oh...I'm sorry. Let me revise it and put the teams that deserve to be in.

(1)Alabama (13-0) vs (8)Alabama (13-0)
(4)Alabama (13-0) vs (5)Alabama (13-0)

(2)Alabama (13-0) vs (7)Alabama (13-0)
(3)Alabama (13-0) vs (6)Alabama (13-0)

 

[4down20]

Oh...I'm sorry. Let me revise it and put the teams that deserve to be in.

(1)Alabama (13-0) vs (8)Alabama (13-0)
(4)Alabama (13-0) vs (5)Alabama (13-0)

(2)Alabama (13-0) vs (7)Alabama (13-0)
(3)Alabama (13-0) vs (6)Alabama (13-0)

Oh nice, go to the extreme in response rather as a way of acknowledging the point demonstrating you have no real argument.

 

[ralphiewvu]

Why wouldnt I, since I am a 2 time graduate of the University of Alabama.

Ohh so you did tell us. Go figure

 

[ralphiewvu]

A W is a W and an L Is an L. Points dont really matter over the test of time except to people like you.

In the context of this argument numbers absolutely mean something. Which you would know if you actually read more then one page and comprehended that. But I’m not sure you are capable of doing that.

 

[Bandwagonbo2]

In the context of this argument numbers absolutely mean something. Which you would know if you actually read more then one page and comprehended that. But I’m not sure you are capable of doing that.

So now context matters. Context like a 21-0 loss being a BCS title game and one team got manhandled from Snap 1. Context like that team was being billed as one of the best teams ever, and the other team didnt deserve to be there. Yeah, context does matter, which is why I said it many posts back. You need to read the posts instead of knee jerk posting

 

[Bandwagonbo2]

Ohh so you did tell us. Go figure

As did you. Tit for tat i guess

 

[ralphiewvu]

So now context matters. Context like a 21-0 loss being a BCS title game and one team got manhandled from Snap 1. Context like that team was being billed as one of the best teams ever, and the other team didnt deserve to be there. Yeah, context does matter, which is why I said it many posts back. You need to read the posts instead of knee jerk posting

To which you were still comparing a 21-0 loss to a 50-0 loss. For the umpteenth time you can’t compare the two. No matter where it is. You sprouting off that it was a championship game doesn’t mean shit when comparing the two. A 21-0 score is still a score people can come back from. No ones coming back from a 50 point deficit. Which is why I made the argument good teams don’t lose by 7 scores. You continue bringing up the championship game still doesn’t mean shit. Good teams lose by 3 scores every no and then. How about reading the whole thread instead of just shouting out it was a championship game like it makes you big and tough.

 

[ralphiewvu]

As did you. Tit for tat i guess

Guess it was worth your time.

 

[Bandwagonbo2]

To which you were still comparing a 21-0 loss to a 50-0 loss. For the umpteenth time you can’t compare the two. No matter where it is. You sprouting off that it was a championship game doesn’t mean shit when comparing the two. A 21-0 score is still a score people can come back from. No ones coming back from a 50 point deficit. Which is why I made the argument good teams don’t lose by 7 scores. You continue bringing up the championship game still doesn’t mean shit. Good teams lose by 3 scores every no and then. How about reading the whole thread instead of just shouting out it was a championship game like it makes you big and tough.

So context only matters when its your opinion, got it.

2001, ECU is winning 38-8 at the half, loses 64-61 in overtime. Thats 4 plus scores they are down and yet they came back to win.

2006, Minnesota is up 38-7 over TTU with almost 8 minutes left in the third. Final was 44-41 Texas Tech. They were down 4 plus scores and won.

2006, Northwestern was up 38-3, thats 5 scores. Michigan State completes the comeback victory of 5 plus scores with 18 seconds left. Winning 41-38.

UCLA just last year completed a 5 score turnaround to win 45 - 44 over TAMU. 5 score turnaround. And it was done in 17 minutes 6 seconds during the end of the third and most of the 4th quarters.

1984, Maryland is down 31-0 at the half. The final score was 42-40. Maryland was led by Frank Reich, who also orchestrated the largest NFL comeback in history toppling the Houston oilers as a backup QB and scoring 35 points enroute to a 41-38 win and send Buffalo through the playoffs to a third straight superbowl they would lose.

Yes teams can come back from 7 scores or lose by 7 scores to other good teams. Its not impossible.

 

[ralphiewvu]

So context only matters when its your opinion, got it.

2001, ECU is winning 38-8 at the half, loses 64-61 in overtime. Thats 4 plus scores they are down and yet they came back to win.

2006, Minnesota is up 38-7 over TTU with almost 8 minutes left in the third. Final was 44-41 Texas Tech. They were down 4 plus scores and won.

2006, Northwestern was up 38-3, thats 5 scores. Michigan State completes the comeback victory of 5 plus scores with 18 seconds left. Winning 41-38.

UCLA just last year completed a 5 score turnaround to win 45 - 44 over TAMU. 5 score turnaround. And it was done in 17 minutes 6 seconds during the end of the third and most of the 4th quarters.

1984, Maryland is down 31-0 at the half. The final score was 42-40. Maryland was led by Frank Reich, who also orchestrated the largest NFL comeback in history toppling the Houston oilers as a backup QB and scoring 35 points enroute to a 41-38 win and send Buffalo through the playoffs to a third straight superbowl they would lose.

Yes teams can come back from 7 scores or lose by 7 scores to other good teams. Its not impossible.

Not one of those games you mentioned was a team down 7 scores and came back to win. NOT ONE SINGLE SCORE. So no, teams don’t come back from down 7 scores. Pretending being down 31 is the same as being down 49 is very very stupid. That’s an extra 2 scores they have to account for on top of the 5 they have. That’s why it’s never been done.

But hey, when it fits your narrative you’ll run with it. Stop changing these fucking arguments and I will too. We both agree to disagree.

 

[Bandwagonbo2]

Not one of those games you mentioned was a team down 7 scores and came back to win. NOT ONE SINGLE SCORE. So no, teams don’t come back from down 7 scores. Pretending being down 31 is the same as being down 49 is very very stupid. That’s an extra 2 scores they have to account for on top of the 5 they have. That’s why it’s never been done.

But hey, when it fits your narrative you’ll run with it. Stop changing these fucking arguments and I will too. We both agree to disagree.

You really think adding 1.5 scores to a game where they came back from 5.5 score is that difficult? Note UCLA score their 5.5 TD's in 17 minutes. Had they started earlier they might have gone to 8 or 0 scores in a bit longer time span. You think its not possible, but it is. Improbable is another question. Thing about scoring 70 points on an opponent, it can be done in a game as your Mountaqueers proved when they beat Clemson. Both were good teams, yet your team scored 70 points on that good team. Its not impossible to see a team coming back from 7 scores, if the conditions are right like they happened in the UCLA game or any of the others I mentioned. Dont be an ass and claim its impossible, because its simply not.