Thanks....you too.Still at a point nothing suprises me with Packers this year... young and inconsistent.
Crosby is a beast... good luck the rest of the way.
Have Jones on my FF but kind of glad he wasn't available last night....LOL.
Thanks....you too.Still at a point nothing suprises me with Packers this year... young and inconsistent.
Crosby is a beast... good luck the rest of the way.
Have Jones on my FF but kind of glad he wasn't available last night....LOL.
Not fishing bro. Honest question. Im not on the fire everyone bandwagon. I believe he deserves a chance to see what he can do without a HoF QB. The only one i think that needs to go is Barry.Rodgers + Adams definitely had a lot to do with the Packers success in ML's first years. They were a finely-tuned machine. It was wise of him to not try to change too much with that dynamic when he got here and simply let them go out there and do what they do.
I'm not naive to what you're truly fishing for with that question, though. You think LaFleur should be replaced and want me to agree with you. At this point, I'm disappointed with how these last few weeks have gone, but still think it's too soon to start thinking about other options. Like I said previously, this team is young and this is a "get experience" season. If we are flipping our coaching staff every time this team faces adversity, things will get a lot worse, not a lot better. We need to give these guys some time to grow together.
Ive watched enough football in my life to over qualify me to comment on any game. Besides, looking at the stats, highlights and comments lets me know just about everything I need to comment on a game. I think the defense does well but the offense doesn’t do them any favors. Too me, the problem is the defense has a hard time finishing. What I mean is, when they absolutely need a stop, for whatever reason, they can’t deliver. They tend to take a quarter, a series off. I put a good part of that blame on Barry. Why they would hire DC with a bad track record is beyond me.You have to play who is on your schedule... if Raiders would have run all over Packers then it when have been under Bad or Ugly. Packers run defense did look better than Falcons/Lions games. They should have more difficult tests going forward... will have to see how respond.
Defense gave up 2 long drives for points that both resulted in TDs. One interception gifted a FG and the other at midfield Packers forced 3 and out. If the defense gives up 17 points in the NFL, they should expect a win... but GB´s offense so poor right now, appears that is still too much.
You only watched last 1:30 of the game, so unsure you are qualified much to discuss the game.
Ive watched enough football in my life to over qualify me to comment on any game. Besides, looking at the stats, highlights and comments lets me know just about everything I need to comment on a game. I think the defense does well but the offense doesn’t do them any favors. Too me, the problem is the defense has a hard time finishing. What I mean is, when they absolutely need a stop, for whatever reason, they can’t deliver. They tend to take a quarter, a series off. I put a good part of that blame on Barry. Why they would hire DC with a bad track record is beyond me.
I do place most of the blame on the offense in this game. Packers were up 13-10 in the 3rd qtr the defense gave up a long drive and score in the 4th to win the game. Yes, the offense failed to score afterwards but like Alexander said, we can’t let them score TDs. I know this is woulda, shoulda, coulda but had the defense not giving up the TD in the 4th, Packers come out of there with the W regardless of the inept offense.I am not much of a Barry fan either and suprised with hire... but the defense did their part in this game.
- 1st Love interception Raiders had ball at Packers 7 yard line... held them to a FG
- 2nd Love interception Raiders close to midfield... big 3rd down sack to make it a 3 and out
- Raiders did not score again after 2nd play of 4th quarter
Packers offense had several chances to take the lead in 4th quarter and put up a goose egg on the scoreboard
I do place most of the blame on the offense in this game. Packers were up 13-10 in the 3rd qtr the defense gave up a long drive and score in the 4th to win the game. Yes, the offense failed to score afterwards but like Alexander said, we can’t let them score TDs. I know this is woulda, shoulda, coulda but had the defense not giving up the TD in the 4th, Packers come out of there with the W regardless of the inept offense.
It's unrealistic to expect any defense to allow zeroes on the board for all four quarters of every game. This is NFL teams against NFL teams, not the Georgia Bulldogs against UW-Stevens Point.I do place most of the blame on the offense in this game. Packers were up 13-10 in the 3rd qtr the defense gave up a long drive and score in the 4th to win the game. Yes, the offense failed to score afterwards but like Alexander said, we can’t let them score TDs. I know this is woulda, shoulda, coulda but had the defense not giving up the TD in the 4th, Packers come out of there with the W regardless of the inept offense.
Blame the offense all you want if it makes you feel better, but like i said, i dont have to see the entire game to to tell you my point is the defense failed when they gave up the go ahead TD when GB was in front.Long drive was 3rd quarter for the TD.... Raiders scored on 1st play of 4th quarter with 2 yard run.
Packers offense had 14 minutes and 56 seconds to take the lead back.
Packers offense immediately responded to the Raiders TD with inteception at mid field... Packers D got a 3 and out and got the ball back for their offense immediately and offense responded with their own 3 and out.
Blame defense all you want if it makes you feel better, but probably better to watch entire game next time.
View attachment 342994
Who thinks that? I dont expect that. That is ridiculous.It's unrealistic to expect any defense to allow zeroes on the board for all four quarters of every game. This is NFL teams against NFL teams, not the Georgia Bulldogs against UW-Stevens Point.
Just a complete fail.
I dont put it all on Love. On top of the injuries is the fact that this offense is very young. Lafleur has to be creative with what he has. Like McCarthy i have my doubts about Lafleur. Even with the injuries and green offense getting goose egged in the first half of the game against the worst defense in the league has to be quite embarrassing.Yeah, it's bad right now. Gotta be careful not to pin this all on one person, though. We've seen this same stretch of futility from GB with Rodgers under center with both McCarthy and LaFleur running the show. Things have snowballed right now.
None of those three key issues plaguing GB right now are terminal faults (except Bakhtiari on IR, but he was gonna be rotational this year anyway).
- The Packers have been fighting injuries to key players all year. The most healthy this team has been was Week 1 in CHI and GB was dominant in that game.
- The OL is the position group most prominently struggling because of it. They can't open running lanes or keep good DL out of the backfield. This team was built to rely on running the ball to be successful this year and they've been getting essentially nothing from it. Can't be successful running the ball on first and second down and wind up with 3rd & 8.
- Bad offensive possessions to start games. GB keeps wearing out their D quickly.
- 3 plays, 8 yds, 1:52 - punt
- 5 plays, 11 yds, 2:44 - punt
- 6 plays, 20 yards, 3:30 - punt
- Self-inflicted wounds keep cutting too deep to overcome.
- Missed FG at the end of the 1st half
- 2nd & 10 on the DEN 44 down by 2 points with < 2 min remaining in the game. All you need is a few more yards and you're in field goal range to win. What happens?... OL takes an unnecessary holding penalty.
The biggest red flag I have with LaFleur is that in both games against OAK and DEN he had EXTRA time to game plan against two of the worst defenses in the NFL and his offense was utterly atrocious the entire first half of both games. There's absolutely no good excuse to come out that bad under those circumstances. Credit to him and his team for repeatedly making second half adjustments that turn an abysmal stinker into a close game, though. LaFleur definitely needs to make some adjustments to his own coaching habits, priorities and perhaps even subordinate personnel to ensure they're ready to compete and execute for a full 60 minutes of every game.I dont put it all on Love. On top of the injuries is the fact that this offense is very young. Lafleur has to be creative with what he has. Like McCarthy i have my doubts about Lafleur. Even with the injuries and green offense getting goose egged in the first half of the game against the worst defense in the league has to be quite embarrassing.
I dont follow the Broncos but i did hear that Wilson is a shell of his former self but looked fine against GB's defense. Once again GB went up on its opponent only to have the defense give up the go ahead score to win the game.
I dont follow the Broncos but i did hear that Wilson is a shell of his former self but looked fine against GB's defense. Once again GB went up on its opponent only to have the defense give up the go ahead score to win the game.