If we are being honest about it, DeVonta Smith is going to establish himself as the best WR in the league within the next 3 years.

[Sweetswingingsammysosa]

I nailed it. You're such a homer

You lose again, You made a false assumption that I believe Watson is better which I never ever stated that. Yes of course Watson has more potential as he's younger, more athletic, bigger, stronger, faster, smarter, etc etc. That doesn't mean he will be better but clearly has waaaaaay more potential than JJ.


Please reach some more this is fun.

 

[PnkPanther]

You lose again, You made a false assumption that I believe Watson is better which I never ever stated that. Yes of course Watson has more potential based off his

Sure, you believe he has more potential, close enough

Classic


alright, you're trolling is boring me

 

[Sweetswingingsammysosa]

Sure, you believe he has more potential, close enough

Classic


alright, you're trolling is boring me

Ok, potential isn't the same as your original claim. Potential is something not yet realized and based off the metrics he clearly has more potential and I would say that if he was on any other team including the Vikes. It doesn't mean he will be better but he possibly could. That's not an outlandish statement at all. So apparently you don't know there's a major difference between potential to be better than and "better than". This is quite alarming and very sad.

Trolling? What, by giving you sound reasoning. Whatever helps you sleep at night little buddy.

If anything you're trolling by intentionally using strawman arguments to attempt to make it appear as though my previous statements are false due to some kind of perceived homerism. You failed to show that JJ beat JA on that play because it was zone defense as I told you so you resorted to calling me a troll and using strawman arguments. These are classic low IQ tactics I see used on these boards.

So the kids on here can only use name calling, saying I'm a troll or a homer because they cannot provide any evidence to refute any of my claims. Hopefully, there are much better posters on here with more integrity and ability than the few I've had discussions with in here. I am very dissapointed so far.

 

[PnkPanther]

Stop acting niggardly.

We going to let that fly @bamagrad75

 

[Sweetswingingsammysosa]

i'm guessing you think Watson is a better WR too

JJ's metrics 6'1" 202 lbs 3 years of experience in the NFL 4.43 40 time 37.5 inch vert 10'6" broad jump, athleticism score 82 Wonderlic score 19 (dumb as a box of rocks). Oh also an emotional baby when he gets beat on the field. Cries like a baby back bitch. Makes a thousand excuses and doesn't accept that he got his ass beat.

Watson's 208 lbs metrics : 1 year of experience in the NFL 6'4 4.36 40 time 38.5 inch vert 11'4" broad jump athleticism score 99 Wonderlic score of 38 which is higher than probably anyone else at his position and possibly higher than 95% of the NFL. Doesn't cry like a little girl if he has a poor game, he just comes back and learns from his mistakes and admits when he sucked.

So Watson is stronger, smarter, faster, bigger, controls his emotions, etc. Now there's other intangibles such as heart, creativity, work ethic, etc. But we can't really measure those and we go off what we see and hear from other people around the league.

So to suggest that Watson doesn't have the potential to be better than JJ is absolutely pure insanity. All the measurable metrics agree with Watson having more potential.

 

[PnkPanther]

JJ's metrics 6'1" 202 lbs 3 years of experience in the NFL 4.43 40 time 37.5 inch vert 10'6" broad jump, athleticism score 82 Wonderlic score 19 (dumb as a box of rocks). Oh also an emotional baby when he gets beat on the field. Cries like a baby back bitch. Makes a thousand excuses and doesn't accept that he got his ass beat.

Watson's 208 lbs metrics : 1 year of experience in the NFL 6'4 4.36 40 time 38.5 inch vert 11'4" broad jump athleticism score 99 Wonderlic score of 38 which is higher than probably anyone else at his position and possibly higher than 95% of the NFL. Doesn't cry like a little girl if he has a poor game, he just comes back and learns from his mistakes and admits when he sucked.

So Watson is stronger, smarter, faster, bigger, controls his emotions, etc. Now there's other intangibles such as heart, creativity, work ethic, etc. But we can't really measure those and we go off what we see and hear from other people around the league.

So to suggest that Watson doesn't have the potential to be better than JJ is absolutely pure insanity. All the measurable metrics agree with Watson having more potential.

 

[Sweetswingingsammysosa]

We going to let that fly @bamagrad75

Let what fly?

 

[bamagrad75]

We going to let that fly @bamagrad75

Nope

@Sweetswingingsammysosa

Don't try that again.

 

[Sweetswingingsammysosa]

Nope

@Sweetswingingsammysosa

Don't try that again.

Try what? Show me what rule I broke. Show me the specific rules I didn't adhere to. If I didn't then leave me alone and don't restrict my free speech. I wouldn't want to restrict yours.

 

[Sweetswingingsammysosa]

We going to let that fly @bamagrad75

Cry to mommy more.

 

[bamagrad75]

Try what? Show me what rule I broke. Show me the specific rules I didn't adhere to. If I didn't then leave me alone and don't restrict my free speech. I wouldn't want to restrict yours.

That is considered to be a racist word. You can read the rules here for yourself.

 

[Mebert]

That is considered to be a racist word. You can read the rules here for yourself.

I am the last guy that wants to come to this dudes defense, but that word is not racist. It is often used by dumbasses because it sounds racist though.

My 2 cents, my other 2 cents are ban the fuck, he is garbage on this site.

 

[bamagrad75]

I am the last guy that wants to come to this dudes defense, but that word is not racist. It is often used by dumbasses because it sounds racist though.

My 2 cents, my other 2 cents are ban the fuck, he is garbage on this site.

Context also matters and it was transparent what he was trying to pull. A zillion other words would have sufficed.

 

[Mebert]

Context also matters and it was transparent what he was trying to pull. A zillion other words would have sufficed.

This I agree with.

 

[Sweetswingingsammysosa]

That is considered to be a racist word. You can read the rules here for yourself.

There is no definition where that word is used as a racist word. If that's true please show me this racist definition. If you can show me this then I will agree. However, if you can't then I have the freedom to use this word as I please as it is not racist in any way. It's a homophone which I have full liberty to use.

No, the burden of proof is on you to show me the rules which I supposedly broke not me. You're the one threatening to stop me free speech I didn't threaten to stop your free speech and you're the one suggesting I broke the so called rules so you need to show me the rule I broke so I don't break that rule in the future. I was unable to find such rules stating we cannot use words that are homophone words (one at which is not racist but sounds similar to a word that is racist).

 

[Southieinnc]

Nope

@Sweetswingingsammysosa

Don't try that again.

Thank you, (said everybody)

 

[Mebert]

There is no definition where that word is used as a racist word. If that's true please show me this racist definition. If you can show me this then I will agree. However, if you can't then I have the freedom to use this word as I please as it is not racist in any way. It's a homophone which I have full liberty to use.

No, the burden of proof is on you to show me the rules which I supposedly broke not me. You're the one threatening to stop me free speech I didn't threaten to stop your free speech and you're the one suggesting I broke the so called rules so you need to show me the rule I broke so I don't break that rule in the future. I was unable to find such rules stating we cannot use words that are homophone words (one at which is not racist but sounds similar to a word that is racist).

Guaranteed the freedom to use the word, not a platform to do it on. I for one agree this is totally unjust, you should reuse the word in the next dozen or so posts to prove your point.

 

[Sweetswingingsammysosa]

Context also matters and it was transparent what he was trying to pull. A zillion other words would have sufficed.

There is no context in which that word is racist by definition. You can believe or feel it's racist but that doesn't change the current definitions of this specific word. We have a choice to use any word we desire within any context as long as they're not defined as racist. You will most likely need to change the rules in order to ban my free speech in this specific case. That would be quite sad if you go to those extremes. Also, the other guy said gay. If anything that's homophobic, yet I am the one being threatened. Very interesting, seems like we pick and chose who we want to speak and who we don't.

Again, I wouldn't restrict your free speech from using words that have no racist definition. Not sure why I am being attacked for doing nothing against the rules. Maybe I hold people to a higher moral standard.

I didn't call someone gay or say gay now did I?

 

[Southieinnc]

Try what? Show me what rule I broke. Show me the specific rules I didn't adhere to. If I didn't then leave me alone and don't restrict my free speech. I wouldn't want to restrict yours.

I imagine there are more than a few people who would like to "restrict your free speach" in person!
Cowardly to play this game anonymously on an internet forum.

 

[Mebert]

There is no context in which that word is racist by definition. You can believe or feel it's racist but that doesn't change the current definitions of this specific word. We have a choice to use any word we desire within any context as long as they're not defined as racist. You will most likely need to change the rules in order to ban my free speech in this specific case. That would be quite sad if you go to those extremes. Also, the other guy said gay. If anything that's homophobic, yet I am the one being threatened. Very interesting, seems like we pick and chose who we want to speak and who we don't.

Again, I wouldn't restrict your free speech from using words that have no racist definition. Not sure why I am being attacked for doing nothing against the rules. Maybe I hold people to a higher moral standard.

I didn't call someone gay or say gay now did I?

I am not shocked you don't understand how free speech works.