GNG
What Me Worry?
“Empire” had the better ending. Luke loses his hand and finds out Vader is his father. Han is frozen and captured by Boba Fett. It ends on such a down note. Just like in real life. All “Jedi” had was a bunch of Muppets.
“Empire” had the better ending. Luke loses his hand and finds out Vader is his father. Han is frozen and captured by Boba Fett. It ends on such a down note. Just like in real life. All “Jedi” had was a bunch of Muppets.
Revenge of the Sith was good...
I don't know, it does kind of point to the Jedi being weak. They see potential in this kid, but can't bring his mom along for the ride?Empire is probably the correct answer objectively but RotJ has always been my personal favorite. I just think it wrapped up perfectly and I loved the Jabba part. Plus, it had the best space battle any film had for decades.
Also, anyone who doesn't rate Phantom dead last is just fucking wrong. You can literally skip the entire movie and not lose any piece of the story. That's how bad the movie is
It shared some of the flaws of Episodes 1 & 2 but it was by far the best of the prequels. No Jar Jar certainly helped but it wasn't the only reason why I think it was the best from the prequels.
Also, anyone who doesn't rate Phantom dead last is just fucking wrong. You can literally skip the entire movie and not lose any piece of the story. That's how bad the movie is
the whole padme to anakin romance was fucked form the start with the age diffrence, another actor could have made this more palatable, but it'd still be fairly poor.I actually think Sith and Clones could have been legitimately good movies with one change; getting any actor better than Hayden Christensen. Much of the story content in them is fine (give or take some things), but his utter lack of talent kept him from conveying the emotions his scenes required. Anakin is suppose to be a cocky, confident guy because he's so gifted and because of that, he gets selfish and becomes corruptible. Yet you get none of that from Hayden. He's just a stiff, blank canvas of nothingness. I bet a lot of people's opinions of those movies would be different if he wasn't in that role.
Other than being first star wars movie in forever, Darth Maul was such a bad ass, really built up that film, only to be let down. Coolest looking darksider.Yes, it is really bad... Too bad that they wasted Darth Maul and the best light saber fight on it. Those to things alone should propel it past AOTC, but Jar Jar is just too much to overcome.
Empire is probably the correct answer objectively but RotJ has always been my personal favorite. I just think it wrapped up perfectly and I loved the Jabba part. Plus, it had the best space battle any film had for decades.
Also, anyone who doesn't rate Phantom dead last is just fucking wrong. You can literally skip the entire movie and not lose any piece of the story. That's how bad the movie is
the whole padme to anakin romance was fucked form the start with the age diffrence, another actor could have made this more palatable, but it'd still be fairly poor.
Side story.Empire for sure but I think Rouge one was he best after the original trilogy.
Hey how come Rouge One does did not get number?
I actually think Sith and Clones could have been legitimately good movies with one change; getting any actor better than Hayden Christensen. Much of the story content in them is fine (give or take some things), but his utter lack of talent kept him from conveying the emotions his scenes required. Anakin is suppose to be a cocky, confident guy because he's so gifted and because of that, he gets selfish and becomes corruptible. Yet you get none of that from Hayden. He's just a stiff, blank canvas of nothingness. I bet a lot of people's opinions of those movies would be different if he wasn't in that role.