• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Patrick Mahomes II is on Pace For 6,592 Yards and 56 Touchdowns

Gatorchip

Well-Known Member
20,090
2,310
173
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Location
Boston
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,015.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3

Gatorchip

Well-Known Member
20,090
2,310
173
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Location
Boston
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,015.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If KC's defense is actually better this season, then there will be no need for Mahomes to achieve this feat.
 

Fountain City Blues

Love Everybody
45,856
13,159
1,033
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Location
The Gates of Hell
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.36
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If KC's defense is actually better this season, then there will be no need for Mahomes to achieve this feat.
Yeah- but when it comes to the Pats- I am not taking chances even if I really doubt AB or Gordon are available come January. Kill that cockroach with fire. I really want Minkah Fitzpatrick. Would be a great fit for this year and the next several without bloating the cap.

Mostly good signs play to play in the secondary. Some work to be done, but it's considerably better than last year's outfit so far.
 

Gatorchip

Well-Known Member
20,090
2,310
173
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Location
Boston
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,015.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
im not rex. we were also discussing the pats DEFENSE.

see his player card on espn

Tom Brady Stats, News, Bio | ESPN
Actually the thread is about offense. You brought up defense. nevertheless...

So, if the Pats defense is "on pace" to give up no more points the rest of the season, instead of an actual projection, then by the same reasoning, it applies to the offense as well. No more points.

With your misunderstanding of "on pace", the link you provided is irrelevant.
 

Rock Strongo

My mind spits with an enormous kickback.
55,878
6,772
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
495 belt
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
completion % 550 lol

avg 75.6 per play lol
 

Rock Strongo

My mind spits with an enormous kickback.
55,878
6,772
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
495 belt
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Actually the thread is about offense. You brought up defense. regardless...

So, if the Pats defense is "on pace" to give up no more points the rest of the season, instead of an actual projection, then by the same reasoning, it applies to the offense as well. No more points.

With your misunderstanding of "on pace", the link you provided is irrelevant.
the stats i brought up for 'on pace' are statistically valid. i misunderstood nothing. i work in statistics and validation.
 

Gatorchip

Well-Known Member
20,090
2,310
173
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Location
Boston
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,015.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
the stats i brought up for 'on pace' are statistically valid. i misunderstood nothing. i work in statistics and validation.
Since you didn't come up with a projected 24 points, I can only imagine how frustrated your boss must be when reviewing your crappy protocols.

Poor guy...
 

Fountain City Blues

Love Everybody
45,856
13,159
1,033
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Location
The Gates of Hell
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.36
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Are we really arguing about tightly controlled statistical analysis in a thread that is talking about a 6500 yard passer?
 

Rock Strongo

My mind spits with an enormous kickback.
55,878
6,772
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
495 belt
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Since you didn't come up with a projected 24 points, I can only imagine how frustrated your boss must be when reviewing your crappy protocols.

Poor guy...
where are you getting this 24 pts from? where did i say anything about 24 pts? or anything about pts other than the number 3?

Spacex relies on my modeling accuracy for launches. i work in thermocouple theory.
 

YankeeRebel

Well-Known Member
15,649
8,747
533
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,800.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
the stats i brought up for 'on pace' are statistically valid. i misunderstood nothing. i work in statistics and validation.

Well fuck, I won't be debating you anymore...

Although stats while they may be accurate can also easily be used to misrepresent.
 

Rock Strongo

My mind spits with an enormous kickback.
55,878
6,772
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
495 belt
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Well fuck, I won't be debating you anymore...

Although stats while they may be accurate can also easily be used to misrepresent.
yup. one can bastardize any data set to fit a narrative. and debate away. i dont work in sports statistics lol.

my stats/data are boring like heat flux and psia/psig.
 

ChicagoIrish

Well-Known Member
7,360
487
83
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 100.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
where are you getting this 24 pts from? where did i say anything about 24 pts? or anything about pts other than the number 3?

Spacex relies on my modeling accuracy for launches. i work in thermocouple theory.

Isn't 3 points in 2 games a 1.5 points per game average? So doesn't 1.5x16 (16 games in a season) come out to 24?

So the Patriots are on pace to give up 24 points per game. But then again, I'm no stat wizard like you.
 

Fountain City Blues

Love Everybody
45,856
13,159
1,033
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Location
The Gates of Hell
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.36
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Isn't 3 points in 2 games a 1.5 points per game average? So doesn't 1.5x16 (16 games in a season) come out to 24?

So the Patriots are on pace to give up 24 points per game. But then again, I'm no stat wizard like you.
I mean, this wasn't a very serious thread. So Rock being silly about 3 points is not out of bounds within the confines of this, erm, analysis; yes, that's what we'll call this.
 

Gatorchip

Well-Known Member
20,090
2,310
173
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Location
Boston
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,015.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I like that 998.4 passer rating :D
It's statistically valid. It's someone's job to provide accurate data, so no chance of error.
where are you getting this 24 pts from? where did i say anything about 24 pts? or anything about pts other than the number 3?

Spacex relies on my modeling accuracy for launches. i work in thermocouple theory.
You didn't say 24. That's the point. Pat's defense average 1.5 PPG. That's 24 over 16 games. Not 3.

You disappoint me metrologist. And why are you using thermocouples, when you want accuracy? Because of reliability?
 

Rock Strongo

My mind spits with an enormous kickback.
55,878
6,772
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
495 belt
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Isn't 3 points in 2 games a 1.5 points per game average? So doesn't 1.5x16 (16 games in a season) come out to 24?

So the Patriots are on pace to give up 24 points per game. But then again, I'm no stat wizard like you.
i said the patriots are on pace to give up 3 pts all year. which, as of now, is true. 3 pts allowed then a shutout. theyve given up 3 pts. if they do not allow a pt the rest of the year they will have given up...3 pts. youre using averages as a projection. they average 1.5 PPG on D over 2 games, but have only surrendered 3 pts in 1 contest. technically we're both right, just taking a different approach. this plays into the "bastardizing metrics".
 
Top