Lol yea, that .141 ISO screams slugger.I already stated why Revere is an excellent hitter. I showed how he clearly improved his hitting - .200, .312,.354,and .388 - 96 hits in 88 games. That is the whole picture. Hitting .300 is vital for a lead off hitter. You say Revere is less than average. No one can believe that when the opposite has been clearly shown. The lead off hitter "creates runs" by getting on base. He likely would have finished the year much higher than .305; that is not delusional, but probable.
Delmon was always a slugger. He would have done better as a Phillie by leading off? It's just dumb trying to compare the two. Revere is a leadoff hitter. It took a month for him to find his comfort zone with a new team and new park. That's the psychological aspect to baseball.
By the way, since you like the comparison, in 88 games (incl April), Revere was .339 with runners on and .352 w/risp; hitting with 2 outs .341; scoring posn, 2 out .441. Delmon in 80 games was .229 with runners on and .256 risp; hitting with 2 outs, .235, scoring posn, 2 out .313. Revere wins over the slugger. lol. What else can I say.
I think what you meant to say "Delmon was always a bad hitter"