- Thread starter
- #1
jvett77
Well-Known Member
The loss of Howard, Revere, and Ruiz for 2 to 3 months each, along with nearly a month of downtime each for Utley and Brown, resulted in 9 player-months lost of your best players. This caused a steep dropoff in hit and run production, 70 hits and 80 runs. And the replacements could not make up for that. The slide in pitching was equally dramatic, especially with the 3-month loss of Halladay.
_______W/L____hits____runs___hr___BA__ERA___ER
2011....102-60..1409.....713....153....253..3.02...495
2012.....81-81...1414.....684....158....255..3.83...618
2013....73-88..1345....605... 139...248..4.28. .677
I think it's safe to say that for each player-month lost, the Phillies probably lost 1 to 2 games, that is 9 to 18 games. And remember, the Phillies lost 27 one run games. Therefore, with a healthy roster, their 73-88 record could well have been 82-80, or even 91-71.
So next year, with the healthy return of all players, plus some positive off-season moves, the Phils will be very much improved. Book it, slam it, rub it down, bank on it.
_______W/L____hits____runs___hr___BA__ERA___ER
2011....102-60..1409.....713....153....253..3.02...495
2012.....81-81...1414.....684....158....255..3.83...618
2013....73-88..1345....605... 139...248..4.28. .677
I think it's safe to say that for each player-month lost, the Phillies probably lost 1 to 2 games, that is 9 to 18 games. And remember, the Phillies lost 27 one run games. Therefore, with a healthy roster, their 73-88 record could well have been 82-80, or even 91-71.
So next year, with the healthy return of all players, plus some positive off-season moves, the Phils will be very much improved. Book it, slam it, rub it down, bank on it.