MBBRL Guillotine

[bksballer89]

In now:

@obxyankeefan
@tlance
@Chef99
@HaroldSeattle
@jwolt92
@Yellow Fuzzies
@molsaniceman
@Barilko
@StuUKWI

Played last year but haven't posted yet:

@bksballer89
@TREFF
@Shanemansj13


If anyone else is interested or knows of someone let me know.

Im in

 

[obxyankeefan]

Yea, teams whose heads have been severed, their players are up to highest bidder the following week.

I cannot state how much i loathe FAAB..so rather than piss and moan like a petulant child, I just stay away. I wasn't aware when I signed on last year

We changed it last year to FAAB. Was WW which I would prefer.

 

[tlance]

ill jump in as the 13th or higher...

Dude.

Just play.

It is fun with any number of teams. You are missing out.

No matter how many you start with, by week 5 or 6 you are down to 10 or less.

 

[tlance]

We changed it last year to FAAB. Was WW which I would prefer.

I’m fine with either.

Both involve layers of strategy that make it fun.

If WW gets more people in we should do that.

But I do think FAAB is better.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Well FAAB is more modern way for waivers. In a league where one lost and your out I feel FAAB is a must IMO. If a key player on your roster goes down and a prime replacement is now available due to a team getting eliminated, FAAB gives you a shot at acquiring said player where in WW most likely you have no shot ( other than if you have top position in WW).

 

[tlance]

Well FAAB is more modern way for waivers. In a league where one lost and your out I feel FAAB is a must IMO. If a key player on your roster goes down and a prime replacement is now available due to a team getting eliminated, FAAB gives you a shot at acquiring said player where in WW most likely you have no shot ( other than if you have top position in WW).

Yep. Lots of ways to use that budget.

And if you really want to get a certain player, you have a shot to do it.

@Chef99 used his entire budget the first elimination on Derrick Henry and he made final 3.

 

[TREFF]

I do believe that FAAB is probably the best way to handle this league, so I'd never lobby to change it.


But I still hate it . I'd probably go for a reverse standings, weekly reset waiver priority in this format if it were up to me (of course that's what I advocate for regardless of format) But,t i know that that system is very unpopular 'round these parts.

so I'll just be a lurker and watch from the stands on this one. I can say that if I could get over my BS against the format, this league would've been a very fun one, so all you lurkers out there, if you like/are indifferent to FAAB..get on board, it's a good time!

 

[tlance]

I do believe that FAAB is probably the best way to handle this league, so I'd never lobby to change it.


But I still hate it . I'd probably go for a reverse standings, weekly reset waiver priority in this format if it were up to me (of course that's what I advocate for regardless of format) But,t i know that that system is very unpopular 'round these parts.

so I'll just be a lurker and watch from the stands on this one. I can say that if I could get over my BS against the format, this league would've been a very fun one, so all you lurkers out there, if you like/are indifferent to FAAB..get on board, it's a good time!

Reverse order of standings is literally the worst.

That is the one that I would sit out for.

So bad. No strategy. Rewards the bad teams, penalizes the good.

Would be particularly awful in this format.

 

[molsaniceman]

im in and i prefer WW but ok w Faab

 

[TREFF]

Reverse order of standings is literally the worst.

That is the one that I would sit out for.

So bad. No strategy. Rewards the bad teams, penalizes the good.

Would be particularly awful in this format.

Well we've had this discussion and obviously neither has changed opinions on it.

Comes down to a philosophical/ideological difference on what the term 'fair' means, and how it should apply to fantasy leagues. We definitely view it from opposite perspectives

But, doesn't matter in this discussion. And like I said, for this format, FAAB is likely the best choice.

 

[obxyankeefan]

And like I said, for this format, FAAB is likely the best choice.

Doesn't mean I have to like it.




No we are not changing it again. We will be FAAB this year.

 

[MilkSpiller22]

Doesn't mean I have to like it.




No we are not changing it again. We will be FAAB this year.

wait.... not even a poll??

 

[TREFF]

wait.... not even a poll??

F polls... dictatorships are also best for fantasy leagues. Don't like the rules? There are a million others, or start your own. Man I hate polls

 

[obxyankeefan]

wait.... not even a poll??

Did the poll last year and FAAB won.

 

[Yellow Fuzzies]

FAAB in this format is definitely best.
Much more strategy than who's up next.

 

[SteelersPride]

f it. Im in if you need one.

 

[Yellow Fuzzies]

f it. Im in if you need one.

You are in as far as I am concerned. this format can support 20.

With Milk I think we are up to 13.

 

[obxyankeefan]

You are in as far as I am concerned. this format can support 20.

With Milk I think we are up to 13.

19 people would have 1 eliminated each week with the championship being week 18.

 

[obxyankeefan]

I am going to put the rules and everything in next week. Figure out who all is in and start the draft sometime late next week.

 

[Yellow Fuzzies]

I am going to put the rules and everything in next week. Figure out who all is in and start the draft sometime late next week.

FYI
I am golfing in Mexico 8/9-813. should be able to access the site if needed. But it is Cabo so Mary and I will be partying!