lainey12
New Member
There's just no context I can reasonably think of where he didn't come off bad in that interview. He let his bitterness show and that's understandable but complaining about being asked to be more of a leader when the examples he listed were so trivial I want to laugh him in the face. And as JTA said his focusing on being the best player he could be didn't really work, so it comes off as more of an excuse.
As to your point about people continuing to be friends with him, I can think of a few friends that have had character issues. I'm quite sure most of us are imperfect, but people are still our friends and care about is anyway.
they were trivial issues, does he really care one if one of his teammates puts on an earring in the dugout after a game? No, nor should he...that's the point he might have been trying to make, he resented even being asked to be some kind of sophomoric hall-monitor.
I had a different reaction, I would laugh in the face of ANY GM that asked one of his players to do this.
I assume you're referring to Hamilton as an example as one of his friends, that's a valid point. Does it negate the fact that Andrus, Beltre were with Kinsler in Hawaii when the news broke and Beltre (for god's sake JD...inexcusable) had to try and get information from his agent to help Kinsler figure out what was going on? Not to me, but that's just another opinion obviously
He's gone, it was a great trade for the team...that's more important than anything.
My motivation for challenging your assertion that this interview has proved major character flaws is simple. I don't trust the majority of print interviews...and hopefully someone here remembers how little stock I tend to give them, lest anyone thinks this is just about Kinsler.
It comes from personal experience.
I'll try and keep it short
1) horror at what these "reporters" get away with
2)learned a lesson fast, put me on camera, so you can't lie or manipulate the interview or stay away from me.
3) it worked.