Introducing ... The T.R.U.E. Metric

[NFL-Solomon]

so im gathering that this is a spec you made up?

Team Ranking Ultimate Epexegesis - Metric - Google Search

Of course, I create these metrics for your edification.

But all of them are made up. At least I don't fudge the data like QBR.

 

[NFL-Solomon]

Ah. Seems like I found the "Steelers are going to have a down year so let's fool with statistics so that I feel better about my team" thread.

ANother pats fan who can't face the truth.

 

[NFL-Solomon]

basically.

"going to 11 superbowls is worse than going to 8"

No, losing 5 superbowls when you only win 6 is worse than winning 3 and losing 1.

 

[NFL-Solomon]

so according to these metrics if a team goes 5-5 in SB in 10 years they are dog shit

Nope, that team would be tied for 13th.

 

[NFL-Solomon]

This metric also states that the Saints had a better year on the “greatness” scale because they lost in the Championship Game rather than the Super Bowl. Haha

This has nothing to do with Conference championships, only what you actually DID in the SB.

 

[RobToxin]

Team Ranking Ultimate Epexegesis - Metric

NET Super Bowl Wins

While everyone lauds Super Bowl wins, there are some idiots out there who try to downplay Super Bowl losses. I probably shouldn't say "idiots" because most of these jackasses know full well what they are doing, and doing it to try to wish away the shame of their fav team. They will try lame rationalizations like "would you rather lose earlier" or "they got to the Super Bowl" or "2nd place isn't 1st loser" but it's all a coverup because their team lost. Some of these same fans will try to lay BS like GOAT calls when the Greatest don't lose on the biggest stage of their vocation, which is why Joe Montana remains the GOAT QB.

But that's not the point. The point is, getting to the Super Bowl and losing, is like making it to the operating room and dying. You get no credit for losing. Now I realize that the pussification-participation medal giving of the devolved America will have the younger fans disagreeing and siding with the shame covered Pats fans, but deep down, everyone knows there is nothing noble in losing.

So let's take a trip down Super Bowl alley, fully acknowledging our team's triumphs and ignominies and see how it plays out from best to worst.

Ranked on Net Super Bowls, ordered on Win % - Losing %, Then alphabetically.

Team Ranking Ultimate Epexegesis - Metric

# TEAM NET W L W%-L%
1 SF 4 5 1 0.60
1 PGH 4 6 2 0.34
3 NYG 3 4 1 0.50
3 GB 3 4 1 0.50
5 BAL 2 2 0 1.00
5 DAL 2 5 3 -0.20
7 NO 1 1 0 0.00
7 TB 1 1 0 0.00
7 NYJ 1 1 0 0.00
7 WAS 1 3 2 -0.34
7 OAK 1 3 2 -0.34
7 NE 1 6 5 0.09
13 CHI 0 1 1 0.00
13 KC 0 1 1 0.00
13 IND 0 2 2 0.00
16 MIA -1 2 3 -0.20
16 PHI -1 1 2 -0.34
16 SEA -1 1 2 -0.34
16 ARZ -1 0 1 -1.00
16 LAC -1 0 1 -1.00
16 TEN -1 0 1 -1.00
22 DEN -2 3 5 -0.25
22 LAR -2 1 3 -0.50
22 ATL -2 0 2 -1.00
22 CAR -2 0 2 -1.00
22 CIN -2 0 2 -1.00
27 BUF -4 0 4 -1.00
27 MIN -4 0 4 -1.00

Non NFL Teams, or Conference Practice Dummies:

Detroit Lions
Cleveland Browns
Jacksonville Jaguars
Houston Texans


Try real hard not to cry on this thread if your team is a practice dummy, or not as great as you'd like to believe in NET.

What if I think comparing my team to practice dummies is an insult to practice dummies?

 

[NFL-Solomon]

What if I think comparing my team to practice dummies is an insult to practice dummies?

I'm sorry, but the Texans inclusion there is more a product of lack of time in the league than any other.

 

[RobToxin]

I'm sorry, but the Texans inclusion there is more a product of lack of time in the league than any other.

And having Bill O'Brien as head coach/playcaller.

 

[Hank Kingsley]

This has NOTHING to do with that.

This has to do with what actually happened.

Sure you can say you'd rather have that big game chance, but you lose it, and you are lesser than those who won the same and didn't lose.

It's why a Hole in One is celebrated, and a Hole in Seventy-two is not.

I had a hole in one once.

Shanked it, hit a root, bounced right hard and would have gone way past the green if it hadn't hit the flag dead fucking on and dropped in. An amazing luck sack move.

It didn't stop the cokesackers within viewing distance to demand drinks at the 19th.

Fuck those guys. I finished up 18 and went home to do my boozing....

 

[HaroldSeattle]

I had a hole in one once.

Shanked it, hit a root, bounced right hard and would have gone way past the green if it hadn't hit the flag dead fucking on and dropped in. An amazing luck sack move.

It didn't stop the cokesackers within viewing distance to demand drinks at the 19th.

Fuck those guys. I finished up 18 and went home to do my boozing....

You cheaped out Hank? I'm shocked. Thought you were more of a stand up guy! Just joking, screw those leaches looking for a free drink.

 

[Hank Kingsley]

You cheaped out Hank? I'm shocked. Thought you were more of a stand up guy! Just joking, screw those leaches looking for a free drink.

Damn skippy.

They started in about no Hole in One Insurance.

I hit a fucking root and got lucky, I should know about Hole In One Insurance?

 

[NFL-Solomon]

So, … it's agreed, The T.R.U.E. Metric is absolutely true and 100% accurate.

I thought there would be more whining, but you can't argue with facts.

 

[Rock Strongo]

So, … it's agreed, The T.R.U.E. Metric is absolutely true and 100% accurate.

I thought there would be more whining, but you can't argue with facts.

who agreed with you...anywhere? i think i saw a lot of laughing.

I want to introduce the R.O.C.K metric

when i think of it, i'll let you know.

 

[Rock Strongo]

"so you all agree, this metric i kinda pulled out of my ass that no one has heard of or will ever use beyond this thread is 100% accurate. this is me validating myself"

 

[handicappers]

Lol at the fat dumbass.

 

[NFL-Solomon]

who agreed with you...anywhere? i think i saw a lot of laughing.

I want to introduce the R.O.C.K metric

when i think of it, i'll let you know.

Lack of anything showing anything incorrect about it, is agreement. The only thing you guys who are embarrassed of the shame of your teams failures did was try to talk about speculative games before they are played, which has ZERO to do with what has actually occurred.

I would eagerly await the R.O.C.K. metric. Maybe it can go down in message board history like the CBS board F.U.Q.E.R.

 

[NFL-Solomon]

"so you all agree, this metric i kinda pulled out of my ass that no one has heard of or will ever use beyond this thread is 100% accurate. this is me validating myself"

DUDE, ALL METRICS are made up at some time.
Even pass completion had to have someone say passes completed/passes attempted before it was a metric.

And I didn't validate it. The lack of any error or objection to it's validity validated it.

Simply, it's TRUE, and you know it. You may not like what it shows, but you can't deny it's TRUE.

 

[NFL-Solomon]

Lol at the fat dumbass.

Stop calling attention to yourself, it's vain.

 

[Rock Strongo]

Lack of anything showing anything incorrect about it, is agreement.

thats not right at all.

where did you learn that?

 

[Rock Strongo]

DUDE, ALL METRICS are made up at some time.
Even pass completion had to have someone say passes completed/passes attempted before it was a metric.

And I didn't validate it. The lack of any error or objection to it's validity validated it.

Simply, it's TRUE, and you know it. You may not like what it shows, but you can't deny it's TRUE.

tell ya what. when i see "TRUE" metric on my fantasy stats, i'll buy you a new bmw.