- Thread starter
- #81
skinsdad62
US ARMY retired /mod.
Shit i hit the wrong app that was intended for my face book I will delete itWHAT?
Now what I was trying to correct was he was waived with an injury settlement and won’t be back
Shit i hit the wrong app that was intended for my face book I will delete itWHAT?
Shit i hit the wrong app that was intended for my face book I will delete it
Now what I was trying to correct was he was waived with an injury settlement and won’t be back
I get that AP is a future HOF member, but at the end of the day, come game time, AP is just one of 53 that are on this team. Its fair to question if AP dressed makes the team stronger or not, but by no means should Gruden activate AP just because not to is a slap in his face. Personally, I think AP makes the team stronger, but, as Sportster pointed out above, it all depends on the game plan that Gruden is deploying. IF the team we are playing is weak up front against the run, them AP should absolutely be on that field. But if the game plan is one that will be pass focused, including RBs out of the backfield, then AP may not be the best choice. He is clearly the 4th best RB receiver on the team and he has never been great is pass protection.I believe that this is the same thing that was posted yesterday. Gruden states "Eventually there could be a situation where we dress both of them" when referring to AP & Guice. Are you fucking kidding me? If they are both healthy you dress both of them - period. If you need another ST player then sit someone else on the team.
Did you draft one RB high & pay another a bunch of money to create these either/or situations? Again what exactly has Guice done to warrant getting so many carries? I hope that he earns this status, but he has nothing to date to be in this role. This is a real slap in the face to AP. Just puzzling.