Series Thread: 2nd Round: 1) Celtics vs 4) Cavs

[DJ]

Not sure what the Cavs expectations were but they made it farther than last season and they had some injuries. The series vs the Celtics could have gone 6.....maaaaaaaybe 7 with Allen.

 

[The Q]

Spurs in prime position to get garland if they want him

Keldon and a top 10 pick is a good start

 

[shopson67]

Be interesting to see who they replace him with.

 

[shopson67]

Celtics to the “finals” and who is coming out of the west?

 

[shopson67]

I find it hard to believe he won't force his way to another team this coming season (if he wants out) for this very reason.

 

[shopson67]

unless it is LA NY or maybe one or two other cities- they love to have the hot take and try and tear a team down.

If healthy I think the Cavs def. would have pushed this to 6 against the team many thought is/was the favorite to win the title.

but i do agree that Garland and Mitchell together is not ideal- and if there is Mitchell re-signs then trade Garland--- if Mitchell wants to leave--- trade him and keep Garland.

Could've seen this coming when they traded for Mitchell. It's an upgraded version of the Garland/Sexton backcourt, but still not an ideal fit if for slightly different reasons.

What they really need is a scoring 3 in trade for Mitchell, who has one available for a trade? BI could work if he was healthy more often. Suns don't want to move Durant. He'd make sense with the Spurs, but for who? Nets don't want to move Bridges.

 

[The Q]

Could've seen this coming when they traded for Mitchell. It's an upgraded version of the Garland/Sexton backcourt, but still not an ideal fit if for slightly different reasons.

What they really need is a scoring 3 in trade for Mitchell, who has one available for a trade? BI could work if he was healthy more often. Suns don't want to move Durant. He'd make sense with the Spurs, but for who? Nets don't want to move Bridges.

Keldon and 8

 

[shopson67]

Keldon and 8

Keldon only gets you half way there for salary, but the Spurs could absorb the difference. Might take 4 and 8 (if they want picks in this year's draft).

Keldon is a bit meh IMO, but maybe.

 

[The Q]

Keldon only gets you half way there for salary, but the Spurs could absorb the difference. Might take 4 and 8 (if they want picks in this year's draft).

Keldon is a bit meh IMO, but maybe.

Make them take niang as part of it lol

 

[The Q]

Keldon only gets you half way there for salary, but the Spurs could absorb the difference. Might take 4 and 8 (if they want picks in this year's draft).

Keldon is a bit meh IMO, but maybe.

I’d assume Brahman and/Wesley also go to Cavs

 

[DJ]

Keldon and 8

That works but do you think Mitchell really wants to go to a rebuilding situation?

 

[The Q]

That works but do you think Mitchell really wants to go to a rebuilding situation?

I assumed this was garland

 

[The Q]

That works but do you think Mitchell really wants to go to a rebuilding situation?

Either way.

Not sure how much you’re rebuilding since the nba gave them wemby

 

[DJ]

I assumed this was garland

My bad.

 

[The Q]

My bad.

All good

Either works in theory

 

[bksballer89]

 

[DJ]

LOL at gave them Wemby.

Thursday conspiracies with @The Q.

 

[Shanemansj13]

 

[Shanemansj13]

Could've seen this coming when they traded for Mitchell. It's an upgraded version of the Garland/Sexton backcourt, but still not an ideal fit if for slightly different reasons.

What they really need is a scoring 3 in trade for Mitchell, who has one available for a trade? BI could work if he was healthy more often. Suns don't want to move Durant. He'd make sense with the Spurs, but for who? Nets don't want to move Bridges.

A scoring 3 in a Garland trade. Mitchell handled being more of a PG when Garland was out with his face injury and. He did a great job. Adding stronger depth at the PG position is needed too. Ingram makes too much sense but he will want max, injuries, etc. IDK

 

[Shanemansj13]

I think the Cavs will trade Allen and one of Garland/Mitchell. Hope it is Garland