- Thread starter
- #1
lasportzphan
Well-Known Member
Is this team built for it? I don't think so, but we will find out. Go blue!!
of course they are
let's wrap up the division
Spotty defense, poor defensive in game decisions (see Puig), awful situational hitting, suspect managing, no back end of the rotation and a weak bullpen. Otherwise, you are right, this team is very good.
You guys bring up fair and accurate points. The stats of this team boggle my mind at times, for sure. I just fear that elevated competition exacerbates the shortcomings of this team. And who do we put in that 4th starter role?
Gonna be interesting. But you are so righ, his team can "mash" with anyone. The mash was for you mvpuig.
Haren's numbers have been surprisingly good lately, if he can get us to the 5th with only 3-4 runs given up I'd consider that a success.
If the Dodgers are lacking anything for their Playoff run, it's clutch hitting. Dodgers have only one everyday starter batting over .300 in Puig, and he was having struggles until Kemp got in his face. Gonzo is the only guy on the team with over 100 RBIs, and Kemp the only other player with over 75 RBIs.
Kemp is starting to hit a nice stride, but Gonzo is really the only hitter on the team that has proven to be reliable in the clutch. I do like Uribe and Turner. They hit for average and have timely hits, but I don't think anyone would say they are clutch hitters.
So that's my concern...and clutch hitting is what has held us back the past couple postseasons. We know we can count on Gonzo. Kemp is still a maybe, but looking more like his old self each day. However, where else are we going to get some clutch run production?
I see what you are saying, but how clutch was Freese before the 2011 Playoffs, or David Eckstein before the 2006 Playoffs?
I think that while, yes, AGon is the only one that we would call a traditional "clutch" hitter, we are not in the weeds for hitting (even situational hitting). We don't have an every day player who hits above .300 except Puig. But again, we have 9 players who have a .280 average or better, and 7 of them have 320 ABs or more (SVS has 199, and Turner has 277). Any way you want to slice it, that is phenomenal. Some of those guys are slumping more than at the beginning of the year (Dee and Puig), but you look at Kemp, Turner, Uribe, A Gon, and Crawford; those guys are all hitting their stride with a week left in the season. The beauty in that is that there are great chances that at least two or three out of those nine will show up on any given day. That's a great day for most teams.
We really just need a 4th starter and a middle relief and we are a very solid team (minus the errors in the field). And of course, all of this remains to be seen until next month. If we don't hit, it will certainly not be because any 1-7 we throw out there will bat .280 or better.
Dodgers are a top team hitting with RISP... so nope
I think that while, yes, AGon is the only one that we would call a traditional "clutch" hitter, we are not in the weeds for hitting (even situational hitting).
Last night. Bottom of the 5th, 2-2 tie, 2 out, Ellis on third, Puig at bat. Popout.
That's some clutch hitting thar...
We're definitely not in the weeds for hitting in terms of regular season numbers. However, our team clammed up pretty bad last night when things got tight from the 6th inning on. Pretty sure we only had one hit from innings 6-13, and that one hit came from a AAA prospect. That's what I'm concerned about.
The postseason is very different from the regular season, as most everyone knows. Opposing pitching dials it up a notch, and when it does, our situational hitting becomes lackluster. Last night was a perfect example. The game essentially was a playoff game and our bats went quiet.
Of course, it didn't help that we had almost as many errors as hits in the game.
Harren stepped up big time. Props to him.
Last night. Bottom of the 5th, 2-2 tie, 2 out, Ellis on third, Puig at bat. Popout.
That's some clutch hitting thar...