- Thread starter
- #1
Nasty_Magician
Team Player
Sam Adams Can: Boston Beer Co. Looks Beyond The Bottle For First Time
This is on the same level as Guinness out of a can.
This is on the same level as Guinness out of a can.
the stigma against cans is baffling
For certain beers it doesn't make a difference, with Sam Adams it absolutely will.
There's something about how quickly a beer gets warm in a can that really bugs me. You can nurse a bottled beer longer and enjoy it more in my opinion. Something about the hoppy beers mixing with the sort of metallic taste from cans doesn't go over well with me.
There's something about how quickly a beer gets warm in a can that really bugs me. You can nurse a bottled beer longer and enjoy it more in my opinion. Something about the hoppy beers mixing with the sort of metallic taste from cans doesn't go over well with me.
the stigma against cans is baffling
Doesn't taste terrible out of a can but if you truly believe there's no difference than we'll have to agree to disagree. The only reason cans exist is because it's chesper. No I'm not brainwashed or falling for a cliched stigma, this is truth as far as I'm concerned. If there really was no difference breweries would switch entirely to cans.
If two identical beers were poured for you into a glass, one out of a can, and one out of a bottle, could you tell the difference?
Probably, but we're talking drinking out of a can vs drinking out of a bottle. Drinking out of a bottle is more enjoyable. I will fight all of you.
If this is so, why are 60% of the beers sold in the US sold in cans?