- Thread starter
- #1
No love for Crosby.
Garrett did lead the league in theoretical sacks. So congrats to him.
Bingo.Garrett must have had an amazing first 2/3 of the season, considering he completely disappeared for the last 1/3 and the playoffs.
But really, he won this award in the pre-season. It was his turn. Next year is Parsons turn.
Yup. From the start he was the media darling.Garrett must have had an amazing first 2/3 of the season, considering he completely disappeared for the last 1/3 and the playoffs.
But really, he won this award in the pre-season. It was his turn. Next year is Parsons turn.
Yea he was a ghost on the stat sheets for 2 months. Unless you're looking at PFF's stats for "almost" doing stuff.And didnt garrett close the year with like 1 sack the last 7 games?
Watt beat him in every category. And didnt garrett close the year with like 1 sack the last 7 games?
Anyone can cherry pick stats. Garretts' and Parsons' pressure rate was much higher, it wasn't close. Watt had WAY more snaps. He also was very good at sacking the QB while unblocked. Apparently that is a stat too. So the Steeler defense was on the field more bc their offense was so bad. Congrats!Garrett did lead the league in theoretical sacks. So congrats to him.
Higher pressure rate but lower sacks just means they had trouble closing the deal.Anyone can cherry pick stats. Garretts' and Parsons' pressure rate was much higher, it wasn't close. Watt had WAY more snaps. He also was very good at sacking the QB while unblocked. Apparently that is a stat too. So the Steeler defense was on the field more bc their offense was so bad. Congrats!
Garrett had the much higher win rate, pressure rate and double team rate.
View attachment 353973
View attachment 353971
View attachment 353972