• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Texas Rangers vs Milwaukee Brewers (8/13-8/14)

RevSader

In Beltre we trust.
14,676
440
83
Joined
Apr 27, 2013
Location
Houston, Texas
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Go Rangers keep it rolling!
 

fordman84

@Fordman84_Tx
Supporting Member Level 3
84,413
14,070
1,033
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 8,484.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Go Rangers keep it rolling!

Keep it rolling is exactly what I was going to say.

And I hope the Astros can put some hitting together and go on like a little 3 or 4 game win streak :evil:
 

ESPN Refugee

Well-Known Member
4,454
58
48
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Hopefully they're 2 wins. Need to take advantage of the more easier schedule.
 

TDs3nOut

Well-Known Member
13,504
2,382
293
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 100.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Go Rangers keep it rolling!

No doubt! Wining eight in a row and thirteen of fourteen has been an amazing response to losing eight of the first ten after the break. Keep it going, Rangers!
 

Sexy

Emotion in Motion
1,079
0
36
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Sexy's Power Rankings
1 BRAVES (72-46)
2 TIGERS (69-47)
3 DODGERS (67-50)
4 RANGERS (69-50)
5 RED SOX (71-49)
6 PIRATES (70-47)
7 CARDINALS (67-50)
8 RAYS (66-50)
9 A'S (67-50)
10 REDS (65-52)
11 ORIOLES (65-52)
12 ROYALS (61-54)
13 INDIANS (63-55)
14 D-BACKS (59-57)
15 YANKEES (59-57)

I have the Rangers up above the Sox, Pirates, Cards. Bite me.
 

RevSader

In Beltre we trust.
14,676
440
83
Joined
Apr 27, 2013
Location
Houston, Texas
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Sexy's Power Rankings
1 BRAVES (72-46)
2 TIGERS (69-47)
3 DODGERS (67-50)
4 RANGERS (69-50)
5 RED SOX (71-49)
6 PIRATES (70-47)
7 CARDINALS (67-50)
8 RAYS (66-50)
9 A'S (67-50)
10 REDS (65-52)
11 ORIOLES (65-52)
12 ROYALS (61-54)
13 INDIANS (63-55)
14 D-BACKS (59-57)
15 YANKEES (59-57)

I have the Rangers up above the Sox, Pirates, Cards. Bite me.
My power rankings are based on the team I want to watch most.
1. Texas Rangers
2-30. IDGAF
 

Hambombs

Well-Known Member
18,483
939
113
Joined
Sep 26, 2011
Location
Sevs or quick chek
Hoopla Cash
$ 200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Sexy's Power Rankings
1 BRAVES (72-46)
2 TIGERS (69-47)
3 DODGERS (67-50)
4 RANGERS (69-50)
5 RED SOX (71-49)
6 PIRATES (70-47)
7 CARDINALS (67-50)
8 RAYS (66-50)
9 A'S (67-50)
10 REDS (65-52)
11 ORIOLES (65-52)
12 ROYALS (61-54)
13 INDIANS (63-55)
14 D-BACKS (59-57)
15 YANKEES (59-57)

I have the Rangers up above the Sox, Pirates, Cards. Bite me.

:suds:
 

Nightcrawler

Well-Known Member
9,910
1,366
173
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Location
San Antonio
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
This is an important series. It's important to win and cover our own asses. Especially, while Houston is playing against the douchebag A's....
 

romeo212000

Self-proclaimed Asshole
67,379
4,403
293
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,441.75
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I thought Houston was done with the A's?
 

romeo212000

Self-proclaimed Asshole
67,379
4,403
293
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,441.75
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
So when does their schedule get tougher?
 

Windingmywatch

Well-Known Member
5,344
57
48
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Location
Sherwood AR and Hickory Creek TX
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Their fans..?

... but not us.

If they want a NL Power Rankings list ... fine. But combining something as irrelevant as power rankings into a single list has zero relevance and utility. Why have a list of who is at the bottom? They already know they are on the bottom. Only need the top 5 in each league ... but again ... power rankings have zero to do with standings. If it has zero to do with standings ... it is a waste of bytes.
 

romeo212000

Self-proclaimed Asshole
67,379
4,403
293
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,441.75
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
... but not us.

If they want a NL Power Rankings list ... fine. But combining something as irrelevant as power rankings into a single list has zero relevance and utility. Why have a list of who is at the bottom? They already know they are on the bottom. Only need the top 5 in each league ... but again ... power rankings have zero to do with standings. If it has zero to do with standings ... it is a waste of bytes.

Has nothing to do with anything except generating clicks, conversation, and ad revenue.
 
Top