- Thread starter
- #1
podsox
Well-Known Member
embarrassing move on his part. we get you want a new contract but this isn't how you go about it
Matt Forte may want to remember Brian Piccolo passed away while trying to play in a sport where he is now seeking an extension worth millions. Class act, that Forte is.
He might get Sayers, but he probably doesn't even know who Piccolo was or what the award means.
he has been around the team long enough to know who he is. this is a jackass move and deserves a heavy dose of negative publicity
Agree 100%...my point was...some of these younger guys rarely know much about the history of the teams they play on...it's about the dollar, and only about the dollar for some of them....I could be wrong, but I think this is the 2nd contract squawking we've heard from Forte...I know the 1st one was legit, but 30 y/o RB trying to cash out?
RB is coming back into vogue and will never be dime a dozen for quality. Still the most important position outside of QB.Guy probably doesn't even deserve his current contract. He ran like he had bricks tied to the bottom of his cleets the second half of last season. He's 30, with a lot of mileage, and RB is becoming more and more of a dime-a-dozen position in the NFL. He knows all of this, so he's looking for one last pay day.
RB is coming back into vogue and will never be dime a dozen for quality. Still the most important position outside of QB.
Couldn't be farther on the other side of the spectrum. I do not even feel it has top 15 value amongst the 22 positions on each side. The draft in recent years supports this. To suggest that it is more important than offensive and defensive line to me is asinine.
I believe if you have a top QB and a solid O-line, you could pull guys off of the street and compete to win a SB. Then dump them the next year if need be, and continue making deep playoff runs.
I've been watching New England, New Orleans and Peyton Manning's offenses do this for years. I also watched GB do this in 2010 and win a SB.
It's the Marshawn Lynch's, Adrian Peterson's, etc… that are the dying breed. Not the other way around. You no longer run the ball the majority of the time to set up the pass in this league. If you have a QB who can throw the ball, and a line that can block. It truly just does not matter who you plug in at RB. You need a competent runner, and a competent pass blocker. In the right system, a back who can do both well will be a star. In the wrong one, he will become a cast-off.
Belichick knows the score… "Oh you have a fumbling problem?"… "Oh, you want a raise?"… "Another body please! All I need… another body! I don't care who it is!". Why do you think Blount looks like a pro bowler every time he goes there?
Guy probably doesn't even deserve his current contract. He ran like he had bricks tied to the bottom of his cleets the second half of last season. He's 30, with a lot of mileage, and RB is becoming more and more of a dime-a-dozen position in the NFL. He knows all of this, so he's looking for one last pay day.
You named a lucky few teams with elite QBs. They can get by with less at RB. But every team needs a solid run game to control the ball and rest the D. Like you said rich were on different sides of the spectrum. I believe these last few years proved how important the run game still is and I believe the RB is regaining it's importance around the league. Without a elite QB it still holds major value.Couldn't be farther on the other side of the spectrum. I do not even feel it has top 15 value amongst the 22 positions on each side. The draft in recent years supports this. To suggest that it is more important than offensive and defensive line to me is asinine.
I believe if you have a top QB and a solid O-line, you could pull guys off of the street and compete to win a SB. Then dump them the next year if need be, and continue making deep playoff runs.
I've been watching New England, New Orleans and Peyton Manning's offenses do this for years. I also watched GB do this in 2010 and win a SB.
It's the Marshawn Lynch's, Adrian Peterson's, etc… that are the dying breed. Not the other way around. You no longer run the ball the majority of the time to set up the pass in this league. If you have a QB who can throw the ball, and a line that can block. It truly just does not matter who you plug in at RB. You need a competent runner, and a competent pass blocker. In the right system, a back who can do both well will be a star. In the wrong one, he will become a cast-off.
Belichick knows the score… "Oh you have a fumbling problem?"… "Oh, you want a raise?"… "Another body please! All I need… another body! I don't care who it is!". Why do you think Blount looks like a pro bowler every time he goes there?
Actually you're both kind of right in a way...the year NO won the SB...they had a very good running game...PM won with Edge carrying the rock no wins since for Manninng....
Point...you're right in that teams don't really need a bell cow back, and maybe that's your basic point...but you do need a legit running game to keep the chains moving and to give playaction some credence. Even in this modern pass happy era of the NFL...still gotta have some balance to win it all.
Actually he is only 29 and won't be 30 until Dec 10. Take an interest man.