UK Cowboy
Happy Father's Day T-Roy
Or, with 9 teams, 2 teams play a wildcard game to cut it to 8. I volunteer to play on the WC game and challenge anyone to come party with me
Round 1:
Game 1 - Team 1 vs. Team 2
Game 2 - Team 3 vs. Team 4
Game 3 - Team 5 vs. Team 6
Round 2:
Game 4 - Team 7 vs. Loser Game 1 (loser eliminated if Loser Game 1)
Game 5 - Loser Game 2 vs. Loser Game 3 (Loser Eliminated)
Game 6 - Team 8 vs. Team 9
Game 7 - Team 10 vs. Winner Game 1
Game 8 - Winner Game 2 vs. Winner Game 3
Round 3:
Game 9 - Loser Game 6 vs. Winner Game 4 (Loser Eliminated if Loser Game 6)
Game 10 - Winner Game 5 vs. Winner Game 6 (Loser Eliminated if Loser gas 2 losses).
Game 11 - Winner Game 7 vs. Winner Game 8
Game 12 - Loser Game 4 (if not eliminated) vs. Loser Game 8 (bye if no opponent)
Round 4:
Game 13 - Winner Game 9 vs. Winner Game 10
Game 14 - Winner Game 11 vs. Winner Game 12
Round 5:
Game 15 - Winner Game 13 vs. Winner Game 14 (Winner Champ)
Game 16 - Loser Game 13 vs. Loser Game 14 (Winner 3rd)
I'm with Nos, I'd rather play an extra game and at least have a chance to match up....how about if we do the WC game, not only does the winner get to pick his 2nd round opponent(an advantage), but the loser of the WC game is the tiebreaker vote the rest of the way instead of using a list?I've read through everything, and a few thoughts... First, glad to see UK and Ritzy back, hope for more to return as well... The more teams the harder it is to stack... Second, voting is pretty tricky, simply because everybody has a right to feel how they feel... I agree with Milk in that discussion is the only way to get people to see what you were trying to do... They still might not agree but at least the draftee and those who oppose him can see the other side... And so I think there should be some sort of explaination to why you voted a certain way... I know it's asking people to put some time into each vote, but I feel it's worth it to all involved since people are putting so much time into each team... I feel voting should take a day so people have time to evaluate each team... I know once somebody loses they want to go on to the next one however, this is where common courtesy comes into play... It may take a little longer but I think it's appropriate in that as much as it's all about the joy, everybody wants to win... Lastly, to get us to 8 either we drop the excess via a 1 team list of the weakest team... The person who's team gets the most votes as the weakest is out... If it's 10, you drop 2 and so on...those voted out don't vote unless there is a tie... In the event that there is more than 1 person, they alternate as the tie breaker vote... Go by abc order to see who would vote first... Or we do the same process and have a play in for the extra teams to make it to 8... That's all I got...
Seconded.pre-1900
How about its open, but in addition to 24 different teams, we go 2 players max per decadeSo.... What we doin'?
How about its open, but in addition to 24 different teams, we go 2 players max per decade
2000, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, 00, pre 00
2 per decade, all different teams. Even wide open will be different. No cap necessary