- Thread starter
- #61
LOL they get way carried away even if your a Pitt fan. Going 3 or 4 in FF drafts, putting up WR1 numbers.
To skip the intro jump to 16:20
Anyone know of any one single site or news outlet or whatever, that is compiling all these pro day measurements..like what we'd get if they all went to Indianapolis?
Outside of Lawrence, my gut says no. However, each one has something, where, given the cards falling right, they all "could" be better.Last year, in my orher dynasty league, i drafted Joe Burrows. Where does this year's crop of QB rank compared to Burrows?
Probably wont have a shot at Lawrence, so do you see an upgrade in this year's class with the other QB?
Thanks.Outside of Lawrence, my gut says no. However, each one has something, where, given the cards falling right, they all "could" be better.
I'd say Mac Jones has the smallest chance of being better. With the way the game has evolved, he'd have to have the mind and decision making abilities of a Brady or Manning to be on par, fantasy wise, with the new generation of QBs.
Fields may very well be the best of them all, certainly has the physical tools to be, also has the most question marks. Wether those question marks are legit, or just BS that is being thrown his way..I dunno.
Personally I like Lance, but, I wouldn't say I see him as being better than Burrows. He may very well be, but it won't be for a year or two at best if he is.
You have Burrows draft another needLast year, in my orher dynasty league, i drafted Joe Burrows. Where does this year's crop of QB rank compared to Burrows?
Probably wont have a shot at Lawrence, so do you see an upgrade in this year's class with the other QB?
Yep, he's definitely one that would be best suited to just watch and learn for a year or twoThanks.
I know its brave to reply this close to the draft.
Fantasy Pros pretty much has them ranked 1) Lawrence, 2) Fields, 3) Wilson, 4) Lance, and 5) Jones.
Washington's GM more or less eliminated Lance based on his starts. Maybe its an overreaction, but his reasoning is not without merit considering how Trubisky panned out.
Mehhh..you ain't wrong, but most of these guys are likely to go mid second round, or later in rookie drafts..if your looking to fill a need that deep into the draft, you'll likely be disappointed anyways. And if your QB's consisted of Burrows and any one of Rivers, Brady, Ben, Trubs, Goff, Foles, ...it's still a needYou have Burrows draft another need
I'd prefer whichever lands in NE...longterm I trust that coaching staff to groom and coach. Whoever ends up in Denver better have it figured out alreadyIn a vacuum, Fields is one to grab in the latter second round. He may not ever be Burrow, but at least you aren't paying a premium to find out. My take is Lawrence will go first, but the guy I want is whomever lands in SF. The guy that lands in Denver may be a sneaky good FF pick. I hope it is Fields to have two great options there in the second.
Amen, I just don't trust any ALA QB's .honestly It's a far cry from playing behind the best oline in college with great supporting cast to the NFL on a team that is likely average across the board. So far on Namath has made the transition - - and that's a big sample size.Outside of Lawrence, my gut says no. However, each one has something, where, given the cards falling right, they all "could" be better.
I'd say Mac Jones has the smallest chance of being better. With the way the game has evolved, he'd have to have the mind and decision making abilities of a Brady or Manning to be on par, fantasy wise, with the new generation of QBs.
Fields may very well be the best of them all, certainly has the physical tools to be, also has the most question marks. Wether those question marks are legit, or just BS that is being thrown his way..I dunno.
Personally I like Lance, but, I wouldn't say I see him as being better than Burrows. He may very well be, but it won't be for a year or two at best if he is.
Course the 49ers have a great supporting cast and I think Shanahan likes a pocket passer. I'm looking forward to seeing who the 49ers take.Amen, I just don't trust any ALA QB's .honestly It's a far cry from playing behind the best oline in college with great supporting cast to the NFL on a team that is likely average across the board. So far on Namath has made the transition - - and that's a big sample size.
Amen, I just don't trust any ALA QB's .honestly It's a far cry from playing behind the best oline in college with great supporting cast to the NFL on a team that is likely average across the board. So far on Namath has made the transition - - and that's a big sample size.
Stabler and Bart Starr both went to Alabama. If you only count the last 50 years though Richard Todd has had the best NFL career.