1980's San Francisco 49ers

[DoobieKeebler]

Look back at the 1980's San Francisco 49ers as the Team of The Decade

Sound was ahead of the video by 5 seconds or so, but I still think the video is worth watching.


Team of the Decade..... And with harbaalke, I fully expect a new decade of WINNING from this bunch. :charlie:

 

[deep9er]

so far Baalke has shown some talent evaluation, can't say he IS in fact good, but so far its ok. if he keeps this up we should be ok with winning for awhile.

but how we do in the play-offs and winning superbowl year over year.......still depends on the QB.

 

[Bemular]

so far Baalke has shown some talent evaluation, can't say he IS in fact good, but so far its ok. if he keeps this up we should be ok with winning for awhile.

but how we do in the play-offs and winning superbowl year over year.......still depends on the QB.

Baalke didn't win Executive of the Year because he is just "ok", Deep - C'mon man that is just silly. He has thus far demonstrated a very high caliber as a GM - and hopefully his overall #1 scouted talent & signing will keep him there for years to come.

 

[deep9er]

Baalke didn't win Executive of the Year because he is just "ok", Deep - C'mon man that is just silly. He has thus far demonstrated a very high caliber as a GM - and hopefully his overall #1 scouted talent & signing will keep him there for years to come.

my thought is based on long term.....as in team of the '80's....ie team of the decade per original post.

whereas Executive of the Year means exactly that......'year'.

so while i like what Baalke has done to date, it hasn't been a 'decade' by any stretch.

 

[Bemular]

my thought is based on long term.....as in team of the '80's....ie team of the decade per original post.

whereas Executive of the Year means exactly that......'year'.

so while i like what Baalke has done to date, it hasn't been a 'decade' by any stretch.

You need to review your own comment then, because my response addressed the time frame YOU proposed for Baalke not the OP.

 

[deep9er]

You need to review your own comment then, because my response addressed the time frame YOU proposed for Baalke not the OP.

what time frame?

believe it was 'so far' meaning in starting off his "decade".

 

[Flyingiguana]

Baalke didn't win Executive of the Year because he is just "ok", Deep - C'mon man that is just silly. He has thus far demonstrated a very high caliber as a GM - and hopefully his overall #1 scouted talent & signing will keep him there for years to come.

his best signing was harbaugh. i think he's above average, but a bit too early to give him too much high praise at this point.

 

[clyde_carbon]

Baalke didn't win Executive of the Year because he is just "ok", Deep - C'mon man that is just silly. He has thus far demonstrated a very high caliber as a GM - and hopefully his overall #1 scouted talent & signing will keep him there for years to come.

Executive of the Year doens't make any sense anyways.

 

[Bemular]

~

what time frame?

believe it was 'so far' meaning in starting off his "decade".

Deep a decade is 10 years. Undefined, the phrase "so far" means from an appropriate contextual beginning to the current point in time; which in this case has not been 10 years.

Thus, "SO FAR" Baalke has won EOY and has demonstrated a very high caliber as a GM as far as his scouting and decision making has reflected.

Whether he continues along this line or even improves upon this performance is yet to be known, but to say your "...thought is based on long term", suggests you can predict the future - Which is cool if you can, but I would question such a claim.

 

[Bemular]

Executive of the Year doens't make any sense anyways.

Why?

 

[imac_21]

Baalkes drafts have all been subpar. He can't be a good executive with subpar drafts.

 

[Bemular]

Baalkes drafts have all been subpar. He can't be a good executive with subpar drafts.

WTF!! There has to be a joke in there somewhere -

 

[MHSL82]

Baalkes drafts have all been subpar. He can't be a good executive with subpar drafts.

WTF!! There has to be a joke in there somewhere -

Poor Deep9er, he's never going to live that down. Now, people should quote him as saying that Baalke's an 'ok' GM.

(Sarcasm alert) But Deep is right, Baalke has only completed a few years in GM and the like work, a poor percentage out of ten years, which can't be any better than 'ok'. I anticipate that percentage going up every year, until eventually being a full decade.

 

[Bemular]

Poor Deep9er, he's never going to live that down. Now, people should quote him as saying that Baalke's an 'ok' GM.

(Sarcasm alert) But Deep is right, Baalke has only completed a few years in GM and the like work, a poor percentage out of ten years, which can't be any better than 'ok'. I anticipate that percentage going up every year, until eventually being a full decade.

Huh?

 

[imac_21]

WTF!! There has to be a joke in there somewhere -

Deep said on the old board that Baalke and McCloughan never had a draft with us that was par or better. Crimson can outline it better as they went back and forth for a long while about it.

That included the 2007 draft that netted us Patrick Willis, Joe Staley, Ray MacDonald, Dashon Goldson and Tarrel Brown.

 

[Bemular]

Deep said on the old board that Baalke and McCloughan never had a draft with us that was par or better. Crimson can outline it better as they went back and forth for a long while about it.

That included the 2007 draft that netted us Patrick Willis, Joe Staley, Ray MacDonald, Dashon Goldson and Tarrel Brown.

Wow, okay, now I understand. Crazy, just crazy.