1969 & 1996 Five HOFers Play-In 1 : Nos vs Shane

[Nosferatu]

NOS

LINEUP
1. Tim Raines (B) - DH - 96
2. Bobby Abreu (L) - RF - 96
3. Barry Bonds (L) - LF - 96
4. Harmon Killebrew (R) - 3B - 69
5. Willie McCovey (L) - 1B - 69
6. Andruw Jones (R) - CF - 96 : Vada Pinson (L) - CF - 69
7. Jeff Kent (R) - 2B - 96
8. Thurman Munson (R) - C - 69
9. Omar Vizquel (B) - SS - 96

ROTATION
1. Jim Palmer (R) - 69
2. Gaylord Perry (R) - 69
3. Andy Messersmith (R) - 69
4. Jimmy Key (L) - 96
5. Camilo Pascual (R) - 69

BULLPEN
Rick Aguilera (R) - 96
Dan Plesac (L) - 96
Jim Brewer (L) - 69
Roberto Hernandez (R) - 96
Paul Assenmacher (L) - 96

VS

SHANE

LINEUP
1. Joe Morgan (L) - 2B - 69
2. Larry Walker (L) - RF - 96
3. Alex Rodriguez (R) - 3B - 96
4. Frank Thomas (R) - DH - 96
5. Jim Edmonds (L) - CF - 96 : Eric Davis (R) - CF - 96
6. Mike Piazza (R) - C - 96
7. Billy Williams (L) - LF - 69
8. Mo Vaughn (L) - 1B - 96 : Steve Garvey (R) - 1B - 69
9. Alan Trammell (R) - SS - 96

ROTATION
1. Juan Marichal (R) - 69
2. Sam McDowell (L) - 69
3. David Cone (R) - 96
4. Denny McLain (R) - 69
5. Dean Chance (R) - 69

BULLPEN
Mike Marshall (R) - 69
Don McMahon (R) - 69
Arthur Rhodes (L) - 96
Darold Knowles (L) - 69
Todd Worrell (R) - 96

 

[Nosferatu]

NOS - 5
SHANE - 1

VOTED - UK, Shane, Nos, Ritz, Meebs, Milk

 

[UK Cowboy]

Nos

 

[Shanemansj13]

I think my lineup is better top to bottom and even though his 1-2 is better not enough to overcome. I got me in a very close one. Nos with a great team again, no surprise.

 

[Nosferatu]

This is a great first round game. I do like Shane's lineup but he has an awful lot of strikeouts in that lineup. My pitching is better in the rotation and bullpen. Two very good clubs but I have the better "Team".

I got me

 

[Ritzarmy]

Nos

 

[Mebert]

Nos

 

[MilkSpiller22]

I got Nos... Messersmith is my mock draft boy...

 

[femurov]

Nos

 

[blstoker]

Nos

 

[Ritzarmy]

Since nos won without actually needing my vote then can I retract my vote for him and vote for Shane instead. I like Nos's team better but I like Shane as a person more. Shane you are #1 in my books.

 

[Nosferatu]

Since nos won without actually needing my vote then can I retract my vote for him and vote for Shane instead. I like Nos's team better but I like Shane as a person more. Shane you are #1 in my books.

Ass licker!

 

[Ritzarmy]

Ass licker!

 

[Shanemansj13]

Since nos won without actually needing my vote then can I retract my vote for him and vote for Shane instead. I like Nos's team better but I like Shane as a person more. Shane you are #1 in my books.

The only time Ritz votes for me it doesn't even count, well considering I already lost.

No, you are

Ritz

 

[Shanemansj13]

I'm ready to start the NFL Draft....ass lickers

 

[Ritzarmy]

I'm ready to start the NFL Draft....ass lickers

Ass lick now and kick your ass in NFL draft later. Have you ladies finally set the rules?

 

[Shanemansj13]

Ass lick now and kick your ass in NFL draft later. Have you ladies finally set the rules?

We have already set the rules but I will post them again since you keep wanting to ass lick

 

[Shanemansj13]

Not that it matters but just bc a player strikeouts a lot does not taking away from their hitting. It just means instead of hitting a fly ball or ground ball they missed, obviously. My point is my lineup was great but was also great at getting on base. I didn't lose because of my lineup, I lost because of my weak starting pitching. Just to look at the numbers though...it's easy just to look at strikeouts but better to compare BB's to SO's, also avg SO's per year....

OBP, SLG, OPS

1. Joe Morgan - .392 .427 .819 ---walks to so's - 1865 1015
2. Larry Walker - .400 .565 .965 ---walks to so's - 913 1231
3. Alex Rodriguez - .380 .550 .930 ---walks to so's - 1338 2287 No doubt he was a SO machine
4. Frank Thomas - .419 .555 .974 ---walks to so's - 1667 1397
5. Jim Edmonds - .376 .527 .903 ---walks to so's - 998 1729 No doubt a SO machine
6. Mike Piazza - .377 .545 .922 ---walks to so's - 759 1113
7. Billy Williams - .361 .492 .853 ---walks to so's - 1045 1046
8. Mo Vaughn - .383 .523 .906 ---walks to so's - 725 1429
9. Alan Trammell - .352 .415 .767 ---walks to so's - 850 874

So I had 3 guys that were SO machines but my 1-8 were great at getting on base as well. Half or more could draw fair share of walks as well. Not only could they get on base but they were all power hitters, which that shouldn't count against my lineup IF they could also get on base as well--high OBP.

 

[wlk3]

Not that it matters but just bc a player strikeouts a lot does not taking away from their hitting. It just means instead of hitting a fly ball or ground ball they missed, obviously. My point is my lineup was great but was also great at getting on base. I didn't lose because of my lineup, I lost because of my weak starting pitching. Just to look at the numbers though...it's easy just to look at strikeouts but better to compare BB's to SO's, also avg SO's per year....

OBP, SLG, OPS

1. Joe Morgan - .392 .427 .819 ---walks to so's - 1865 1015
2. Larry Walker - .400 .565 .965 ---walks to so's - 913 1231
3. Alex Rodriguez - .380 .550 .930 ---walks to so's - 1338 2287 No doubt he was a SO machine
4. Frank Thomas - .419 .555 .974 ---walks to so's - 1667 1397
5. Jim Edmonds - .376 .527 .903 ---walks to so's - 998 1729 No doubt a SO machine
6. Mike Piazza - .377 .545 .922 ---walks to so's - 759 1113
7. Billy Williams - .361 .492 .853 ---walks to so's - 1045 1046
8. Mo Vaughn - .383 .523 .906 ---walks to so's - 725 1429
9. Alan Trammell - .352 .415 .767 ---walks to so's - 850 874

So I had 3 guys that were SO machines but my 1-8 were great at getting on base as well. Half or more could draw walks their fair share of walks as well. Not only could they get on base but they were all power hitters, which that shouldn't count against my lineup IF they could also get on base as well--high OBP.

Your team SUCKS! I vote for Nos!!!