- Thread starter
- #1
Those BCS computers looking pretty solid now, amirite?
I been saying all along when it is all said and done people will beg for the computers to be selecting the final 4.
Only if they finally make their algorithms public for scrutiny, the biggest complaint was bias in some of them.
Fair enough. My thing is what forced the big push to get rid of the BCS was the 2011 rematch. The thing is, the computers didn't want the rematch, it was the 2/3 human element. So while that may not be the only situation people like to blame on the BCS, it wasn't the computers that year.
Fair enough. My thing is what forced the big push to get rid of the BCS was the 2011 rematch. The thing is, the computers didn't want the rematch, it was the 2/3 human element. So while that may not be the only situation people like to blame on the BCS, it wasn't the computers that year.
I like the computers. One issue the BCS had was they continually deemphasized computers
Head to head means nothing so whoever wins the playoff really isn't the champion because head to head you know can be trumped by how bad that 1 loss you have.
It has never meant anything. In 1978 the AP gave their NC to Alabama even though USC won it on the field.