- Thread starter
- #1
KickSaveDave
Message Board Migrant
- 822
- 0
- 16
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2014
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,000.00
So, of course the OL could play better. But they haven't played that poorly overall, and they are not the primary reason RGIII has struggled. Here is the evidence:
RGIII 13 qtrs, 100 attempts, 15 sacks. Averaging 1.15 sacks per qtr of play and .15 sacks per attempt.
KC 21 qtrs, 204 attempts, 8 sacks. Averaging .38 sacks per qtr of play and .039 sacks per attempt.
Colt 6 qtrs, 42 attempts, 5 sacks. Averaging .83 sacks per qtr of play and .11 sacks per attempt.
RGIII 7.6 yards per attempt, 2% TD ratio to attempts.
KC 8.4 yards per attempt, 4.9% TD ratio to attempts.
Colt 10.2 yards per attempt, 11.9% TD ratio to attempts.
Conclusive evidence that between both Colt and KC, they took fewer sacks per attempt, threw for more yards per attempt, and threw for more TD's per attempt, than RGIII did behind basically the same OL.
Colt and KC may not be the future answer, but RGIII most definitely isn't.
RGIII 13 qtrs, 100 attempts, 15 sacks. Averaging 1.15 sacks per qtr of play and .15 sacks per attempt.
KC 21 qtrs, 204 attempts, 8 sacks. Averaging .38 sacks per qtr of play and .039 sacks per attempt.
Colt 6 qtrs, 42 attempts, 5 sacks. Averaging .83 sacks per qtr of play and .11 sacks per attempt.
RGIII 7.6 yards per attempt, 2% TD ratio to attempts.
KC 8.4 yards per attempt, 4.9% TD ratio to attempts.
Colt 10.2 yards per attempt, 11.9% TD ratio to attempts.
Conclusive evidence that between both Colt and KC, they took fewer sacks per attempt, threw for more yards per attempt, and threw for more TD's per attempt, than RGIII did behind basically the same OL.
Colt and KC may not be the future answer, but RGIII most definitely isn't.