- Thread starter
- #1
DunceKaep
Trolling 45, it's EASY.
Could easily see the Hawks Trading down to acquire MORE picks.
Without trading players, I see these as possible matches.
Draft Value Chart in Italics.
Sea #26 to New Orleans for #32 and #103 and a possible late rounder thrown in by NO.
( 700 versus 590 + 88 + later round )
Neither team has a 4th or 5th, so this might not work for NO.
I know Seattle likes to accumulate picks, so if they acquire #103, they may trade it (#103) for 2 later picks to another team.
So, would NO move up and not have many mid-round picks?
Sea #26 to Pitt for # 30 and # 105.
( 700 versus 620 + 84 )
Sea #26 to Cleveland for #33 and #108.
( 700 versus 580 + 130 )
Cleveland loses a later pick here, and Gathers their 3rd first rounder. If Clev sees a guy they really
like here, they still have #52 and # 65 and give up #108. Clev needs MANY players, and moving up
7 spots to forfeit a later pick (#108) might be just what Clev needs. They would still have 5 picks in
the first 65, like they currently do, would Clev would go awhile without picking after #65 (next pick
#145). Question is, will 3 1st round picks be too much for Clev. (ie Richardson and Weeden, lol), and
cost wise too.
Sea #26 to Dallas for #28 and #133.
( 700 versus 660 + 40 )
Without trading players, I see these as possible matches.
Draft Value Chart in Italics.
Sea #26 to New Orleans for #32 and #103 and a possible late rounder thrown in by NO.
( 700 versus 590 + 88 + later round )
Neither team has a 4th or 5th, so this might not work for NO.
I know Seattle likes to accumulate picks, so if they acquire #103, they may trade it (#103) for 2 later picks to another team.
So, would NO move up and not have many mid-round picks?
Sea #26 to Pitt for # 30 and # 105.
( 700 versus 620 + 84 )
Sea #26 to Cleveland for #33 and #108.
( 700 versus 580 + 130 )
Cleveland loses a later pick here, and Gathers their 3rd first rounder. If Clev sees a guy they really
like here, they still have #52 and # 65 and give up #108. Clev needs MANY players, and moving up
7 spots to forfeit a later pick (#108) might be just what Clev needs. They would still have 5 picks in
the first 65, like they currently do, would Clev would go awhile without picking after #65 (next pick
#145). Question is, will 3 1st round picks be too much for Clev. (ie Richardson and Weeden, lol), and
cost wise too.
Sea #26 to Dallas for #28 and #133.
( 700 versus 660 + 40 )