Pack 500
Well-Known Member
Because Neal leading the way for Dickerson is fucking unstoppable...
Fullbacks are extinct for a reason
Because Neal leading the way for Dickerson is fucking unstoppable...
Don’t need to pay attention for very long to figure out why having 3 WR and 1 RB or 2 TE 2 WR on the field is much more valuable than any fullbackBecause Millennialz have short attention spans?
DRAFT ORDER
1. Ritz
2. Devil
3. Nos
4. Shane
5. UK
6. 500
7. WLK
8. Femur
Quarterfinals will be!
Ritz vs Femur
Devil vs WLK
Nos vs 500
Shane vs UK
Both just hit the 4 year eligibility mark. Sad their careers were cut short. Both would have been all time greats imoSean Taylor or Bo Jackson weren’t taken what is wrong with me
Don’t need to pay attention for very long to figure out why having 3 WR and 1 RB or 2 TE 2 WR on the field is much more valuable than any fullback
I don't entirely agree, having a good blocking FB is a valuable asset if your best player is your halfback, see Adrian Peterson, he was much better with a FB in front of him so was Terrell Davis.
Adrian Peterson’s teams didn’t win that way because it’s obsolete. Not that it’s his fault he would’ve been better off as an old school player. Today’s backs need to be pass blockers and pass catchersI don't entirely agree, having a good blocking FB is a valuable asset if your best player is your halfback, see Adrian Peterson, he was much better with a FB in front of him so was Terrell Davis.
Adrian Peterson’s teams didn’t win that way because it’s obsolete. Not that it’s his fault he would’ve been better off as an old school player. Today’s backs need to be pass blockers and pass catchers
In the late 90s. It was a totally different world. In 2018 I don’t want to build my offense around a running back who can only play with a full back and is worth nothing in the passing game. In the old school fine. Peterson not winning without Favre is kind of the Point. No matter how good he was it didn’t matter.The Broncos won two Super Bowls because of Terrell Davis. Adrian Peterson's teams didn't win because they had no QB, when they had a QB, Brett Favre they should have been in the SB.
In the late 90s. It was a totally different world. In 2018 I don’t want to build my offense around a running back who can only play with a full back and is worth nothing in the passing game. In the old school fine. Peterson not winning without Favre is kind of the Point. No matter how good he was it didn’t matter.
Still for example I would take Phillip Rivers and an average RB over Adrian Peterson and an average QB in today's NFL. Sure, 20 years ago the answer is different. Nobody is going to win building around a running back anymore unless the back can also be a huge factor in the passing game like a LeVeon Bell, David Johnson, Alvin Kamara, LeSean McCoy type.He didn't need Favre, he just needed a QB that wasn't completely fucking horrible, Hard to win with Travisty Jackson or Christian Laettner!
Who else am I going to pick from the Bucs? Bert Emanuel?Why y’all picking fullbacks when they’re optional?
I have one tooI have one add/drop