- Thread starter
- #1
juiceboxsupply
New Member
the new QBR thing at espn actually made sense to me for a while. I was all for it. Then I noticed that according to QBR, the 2008 version of Trent Edwards was better than the 2010 version of Fitzpatrick. Edwards sucks and Fitzpatrick is good right? What the hell? I wouldn't mind it, but most of the other rankings seemed kind of acturate. Was Fitzpatrick's breakout 2010 actually worse than Dan Orlovsky's and Trent Edwards historic 08 campaigns?