- Thread starter
- #1
TEB11
Active Member
It's obvious Dwight Howard isn't going to resign with the Lakers this offseason. I had my doubts way before the season ended he wouldn't as well. So I ask, why didn't Mitch pull the string and trade this guy? We could have gotten a ton load of talent to fit Mikey D's style of offense. Now, we will be in 100 per cent rebuilding mode and it's going to take a couple of years to get back into contention. I just am not understanding why we kept this guy when we had absolutely NO chance of winning an NBA title this season. Thoughts?