- Thread starter
- #1
wazzu31
Never go full Husky
Heard an interesting debate with the injury recently about the possiblity of just bringing him up for a week or so. Anyone else think he should've been brought up as well regardless of how long he would stay.
A. All it truly costs is an option and an earlier arbitration. If the M's are that concerned about options then they should not have selected him. Who cares if he is arbitration eligible 1 year earlier, isn't that a good sign for the organization if one their top prospects is due for a raise?
B. What does it actually hurt? Give him a couple of games, get his feet wet, get in season advice from the other guys and from his in game experience realize what he needs to work on when he is back down in Tacoma.
A. All it truly costs is an option and an earlier arbitration. If the M's are that concerned about options then they should not have selected him. Who cares if he is arbitration eligible 1 year earlier, isn't that a good sign for the organization if one their top prospects is due for a raise?
B. What does it actually hurt? Give him a couple of games, get his feet wet, get in season advice from the other guys and from his in game experience realize what he needs to work on when he is back down in Tacoma.