• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

If you can't beat'em

Peter Gozintite

NO!...but yes.
Hoopla Pickems Staff
32,567
8,067
533
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Location
Las Muffukin Vegas
Hoopla Cash
$ 103,499.99
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
enjoy it when someone else beats their fucking ass. Fuck the green gay peckers! I might have become a broncos fan for the rest of the season, the Bears aren't doing shit.
 

beardown07

Upstanding Member
69,661
19,393
1,033
Joined
Apr 9, 2011
Location
Pinacoladaberg
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Nope. It was awesome. Rodgers looked like a frightened child out there. Most enjoyable game of the season thus far.
 
4,468
578
113
Joined
Jul 6, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I am very glad the Packers have a loss now. It's good to see AR is human.
 

Peter Gozintite

NO!...but yes.
Hoopla Pickems Staff
32,567
8,067
533
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Location
Las Muffukin Vegas
Hoopla Cash
$ 103,499.99
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Yeeeeessssssssss yeeeeeessssssss. Let the hate flow through you! Do cartwheels through fields of dicks packers.
 
4,468
578
113
Joined
Jul 6, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
interesting stat on the Pack, they're 1-11 out of their last 12 road games vs teams .500 or better.
 
C

cubzzzfanincali

Guest
interesting stat on the Pack, they're 1-11 out of their last 12 road games vs teams .500 or better.

unfortunately, that isn't correct. It sounded wrong when I read it, so I looked it up. Here's their road game log against opponents with a .500 or greater record when met:

2015:
Panthers L
Broncos L
Bears W (ok 0-0 may not count as .500)
2014:
Buffalo (7-6 when played GB) L
Miami (2-2) W
Bears (2-1) W
Lions (1-1) L
Seattle (0-0 see Bears 2015 above) L
2013:
Bears (8-7) W
Dallas (7-6) W
Lions (6-5) L
Baltimore (3-2) W
Cincy (1-1) L
SF (0-0) L

So if you ignore 0-0 matchups, they are 5-6. If you count them, they are 6-8. Either way, not 1-11. Whoever the source was for that, you might want to correct them on this.
 

blh7068

Active Member
596
96
28
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Without looking, Im guessing Nooner was using 2013-2014 season records, and not the record of the opponent at the time(s) they met.
 
4,468
578
113
Joined
Jul 6, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
unfortunately, that isn't correct. It sounded wrong when I read it, so I looked it up. Here's their road game log against opponents with a .500 or greater record when met:

2015:
Panthers L
Broncos L
Bears W (ok 0-0 may not count as .500)
2014:
Buffalo (7-6 when played GB) L
Miami (2-2) W
Bears (2-1) W
Lions (1-1) L
Seattle (0-0 see Bears 2015 above) L
2013:
Bears (8-7) W
Dallas (7-6) W
Lions (6-5) L
Baltimore (3-2) W
Cincy (1-1) L
SF (0-0) L

So if you ignore 0-0 matchups, they are 5-6. If you count them, they are 6-8. Either way, not 1-11. Whoever the source was for that, you might want to correct them on this.
Thanks Cali, I repeated what I read on a different sight. No one corrected him so I thought it must be true. Not even the Packer fans on there corrected him.
 
Top