1880-2000 MLB Mock Draft

[Shanemansj13]

Just some extra stuff for the statnics out there.

Rankings Offensive:

Overall:

Games

1. Ritz (24679)
2. 500 (21446)
3. Milk (21265)
4. UK (21165)
5. Femur (21034)
6. Stoker (20716)
7. Shane (19131)
8. WLK (18995)

PA

1. Ritz (104648)
2. 500 (90126)
3. UK (88987)
4. Ritz (88971)
5. Milk (88062)
6. Stoker (87362)
7. WLK (81058)
8. Shane (80645)

AB

1. Ritz (90963)
2. Femur (77496)
3. 500 (76135)
4. Milk (75732)
5. Stoker (75529)
6. UK (75454)
7. WLK (70449)
8. Shane (69365)

R

1. Ritz (15013)
2. UK (13796)
3. 500 (13712)
4. Femur (13531)
5. Stoker (13283)
6. Milk (12734)
7. Shane (12215)
8. WLK (11709)

H

1. Ritz (26682)
2. Femur (23552)
3. UK (23463)
4. 500 (23238)
5. Stoker (23003)
6. Milk (22584)
7. Shane (20583)
8. WLK (20468)

2B

1. Ritz (4989)
2. Stoker (4532)
3. Femur (4369)
4. UK (4264)
5. Shane (4182)
6. Milk (4095)
7. 500 (3947)
8. WLK (3493)

3B

1. Milk (902)
2. UK (801)
3. 500 (799)
4. Stoker (780)
5. Femur (604)
6. Ritz (570)
7. WLK (560)
8. Shane (443)

HR

1. Femur (3901)
2. Ritz (3816)
3. Shane (3350)
4. UK (3297)
5. 500 (3023)
6. Milk (2861)
7. WLK (2633)
8. Stoker (2576)

RBI

1. Ritz (14100)
2. Femur (13906)
3. UK (13703)
4. 500 (12792)
5. Shane (12173)
6. Milk (11839)
7. Stoker (11473)
8. WLK (10010)

SB

1. Stoker (2998)
2. WLK (2509)
3. 500 (2492)
4. Milk (2155)
5. UK (2126)
6. Femur (1770)
7. Ritz (1758)
8. Shane (1427)

BB

1. 500 (12251)
2. Ritz (11945)
3. UK (11216)
4. Milk (10445)
5. Femur (9996)
6. Stoker (9982)
7. Shane (9737)
8. WLK (9034)

SO

1. 500 (9126)
2. UK (9447)
3. Stoker (9776)
4. Milk (10539)
5. WLK (10748)
6. Shane (12036)
7. Femur (12741)
8. Ritz (13071)

BA

1. UK (.311)
2. 500 (.3052)
3. Stoker (.3046)
4. Femur (.304)
5. Milk (.298)
6. Shane (.297)
7. Ritz (.293)
8. WLK (.291)

OBP

1. 500 (.403)
2. UK (.402)
3. Stoker (.388)
4. Milk (.386)
5. Shane (.3849)
6. Femur (.3847)
7. Ritz (.376)
8. WLK (.373)

SLG

1. Femur (.527)
2. Shane (.515)
3. UK (.520)
4. 500 (.497)
5. Milk (.489)
6. Stoker (.488)
7. Ritz (.487)
8. WLK (.468)

OPS

1. UK (.922)
2. Femur (.912)
3. 500 (.9002
4. Shane (.8996)
5. Stoker (.876)
6. Milk (.875)
7. Ritz (.863)
8. WLK (.841)

Per Game:

PA

1. WLK (38.4060)
2. Ritz (38.1633)
3. Femur (38.0688)
4. Stoker (37.9541)
5. Shane (37.9387)
6. 500 (37.822)
7. UK (37.8400)
8. Milk (37.2705)

AB

1. WLK (33.3794)
2. Ritz (33.1726)
3. Femur (33.1589)
4. Stoker (32.8133)
5. Shane (32.6321)
6. UK (32.0853)
7. Milk (32.0521)
8. 500 (31.9507)

R

1. UK (5.8665)
2. Femur (5.7896)
3. Stoker (5.7708)
4. 500 (5.7544)
5. Shane (5.7464)
6. WLK (5.5478)
7. Ritz (5.4750)
8. Milk (5.3894)

H

1. Femur (10.0774)
2. Stoker (9.9936)
3. UK (9.9772)
4. 500 (9.7520)
5. Ritz (9.7305)
6. WLK (9.6979)
7. Shane (9.6831)
8. Milk (9.5582)

2B

1. Stoker (1.9689)
2. Shane (1.9674)
3. Femur (1.8694)
4. Ritz (1.8194)
5. UK (1.8132)
6. Milk (1.7331)
7. 500 (1.6564)
8. WLK (1.6550)

3B

1. Milk (0.3818)
2. UK (0.3406)
3. Stoker (0.3389)
4. 500 (0.3353)
5. WLK (0.2653)
6. Femur (0.2584)
7. Shane (0.2084)
8. Ritz (0.2079)

HR

1. Femur (1.6692)
2. Shane (1.5760)
3. UK (1.4020)
4. Ritz (1.3916)
5. 500 (1.2686)
6. WLK (1.2475)
7. Milk (1.2109)
8. Stoker (1.1191)

RBI

1. Femur (5.9501)
2. UK (5.8269)
3. Shane (5.7267)
4. 500 (5.3683)
5. Ritz (5.1420)
6. Milk (5.0106)
7. Stoker (4.9844)
8. WLK (4.7428)

SB

1. Stoker (1.3025)
2. WLK (1.1888)
3. 500 (1.0458)
4. Milk (0.9121)
5. UK (0.9040)
6. Femur (0.7573)
7. Shane (0.6713)
8. Ritz (0.6411)

BB

1. 500 (5.1412)
2. UK (4.7694)
3. Shane (4.5807)
4. Milk (4.4206)
5. Ritz (4.3561)
6. Stoker (4.3366)
7. WLK (4.2804)
8. Femur (4.2771)

SO

1. 500 (3.8298)
2. UK (4.0172)
3. Stoker (4.2472)
4. Milk (4.4604)
5. Ritz (4.7668)
6. WLK (5.0925)
7. Femur (5.4516)
8. Shane (5.6622)

Good work Stoke. I dont like to look at totals IMO. Averages is more the way to go

 

[blstoker]

Good work Stoke. I dont like to look at totals IMO. Averages is more the way to go

Thank you. I used to look at averages, totals, top season and top 5 seasons - but no one cares that much - so I just posted the totals and a quick average (would be more accurate if I wasn't so lazy).

 

[Shanemansj13]

Thank you. I used to look at averages, totals, top season and top 5 seasons - but no one cares that much - so I just posted the totals and a quick average (would be more accurate if I wasn't so lazy).

Yes definitely prime of their careers and top seasons.

 

[wlk3]

Just some extra stuff for the statnics out there.

Rankings Offensive:

Overall:

Games

1. Ritz (24679)
2. 500 (21446)
3. Milk (21265)
4. UK (21165)
5. Femur (21034)
6. Stoker (20716)
7. Shane (19131)
8. WLK (18995)

PA

1. Ritz (104648)
2. 500 (90126)
3. UK (88987)
4. Ritz (88971)
5. Milk (88062)
6. Stoker (87362)
7. WLK (81058)
8. Shane (80645)

AB

1. Ritz (90963)
2. Femur (77496)
3. 500 (76135)
4. Milk (75732)
5. Stoker (75529)
6. UK (75454)
7. WLK (70449)
8. Shane (69365)

R

1. Ritz (15013)
2. UK (13796)
3. 500 (13712)
4. Femur (13531)
5. Stoker (13283)
6. Milk (12734)
7. Shane (12215)
8. WLK (11709)

H

1. Ritz (26682)
2. Femur (23552)
3. UK (23463)
4. 500 (23238)
5. Stoker (23003)
6. Milk (22584)
7. Shane (20583)
8. WLK (20468)

2B

1. Ritz (4989)
2. Stoker (4532)
3. Femur (4369)
4. UK (4264)
5. Shane (4182)
6. Milk (4095)
7. 500 (3947)
8. WLK (3493)

3B

1. Milk (902)
2. UK (801)
3. 500 (799)
4. Stoker (780)
5. Femur (604)
6. Ritz (570)
7. WLK (560)
8. Shane (443)

HR

1. Femur (3901)
2. Ritz (3816)
3. Shane (3350)
4. UK (3297)
5. 500 (3023)
6. Milk (2861)
7. WLK (2633)
8. Stoker (2576)

RBI

1. Ritz (14100)
2. Femur (13906)
3. UK (13703)
4. 500 (12792)
5. Shane (12173)
6. Milk (11839)
7. Stoker (11473)
8. WLK (10010)

SB

1. Stoker (2998)
2. WLK (2509)
3. 500 (2492)
4. Milk (2155)
5. UK (2126)
6. Femur (1770)
7. Ritz (1758)
8. Shane (1427)

BB

1. 500 (12251)
2. Ritz (11945)
3. UK (11216)
4. Milk (10445)
5. Femur (9996)
6. Stoker (9982)
7. Shane (9737)
8. WLK (9034)

SO

1. 500 (9126)
2. UK (9447)
3. Stoker (9776)
4. Milk (10539)
5. WLK (10748)
6. Shane (12036)
7. Femur (12741)
8. Ritz (13071)

BA

1. UK (.311)
2. 500 (.3052)
3. Stoker (.3046)
4. Femur (.304)
5. Milk (.298)
6. Shane (.297)
7. Ritz (.293)
8. WLK (.291)

OBP

1. 500 (.403)
2. UK (.402)
3. Stoker (.388)
4. Milk (.386)
5. Shane (.3849)
6. Femur (.3847)
7. Ritz (.376)
8. WLK (.373)

SLG

1. Femur (.527)
2. Shane (.515)
3. UK (.520)
4. 500 (.497)
5. Milk (.489)
6. Stoker (.488)
7. Ritz (.487)
8. WLK (.468)

OPS

1. UK (.922)
2. Femur (.912)
3. 500 (.9002
4. Shane (.8996)
5. Stoker (.876)
6. Milk (.875)
7. Ritz (.863)
8. WLK (.841)

Per Game:

PA

1. WLK (38.4060)
2. Ritz (38.1633)
3. Femur (38.0688)
4. Stoker (37.9541)
5. Shane (37.9387)
6. 500 (37.822)
7. UK (37.8400)
8. Milk (37.2705)

AB

1. WLK (33.3794)
2. Ritz (33.1726)
3. Femur (33.1589)
4. Stoker (32.8133)
5. Shane (32.6321)
6. UK (32.0853)
7. Milk (32.0521)
8. 500 (31.9507)

R

1. UK (5.8665)
2. Femur (5.7896)
3. Stoker (5.7708)
4. 500 (5.7544)
5. Shane (5.7464)
6. WLK (5.5478)
7. Ritz (5.4750)
8. Milk (5.3894)

H

1. Femur (10.0774)
2. Stoker (9.9936)
3. UK (9.9772)
4. 500 (9.7520)
5. Ritz (9.7305)
6. WLK (9.6979)
7. Shane (9.6831)
8. Milk (9.5582)

2B

1. Stoker (1.9689)
2. Shane (1.9674)
3. Femur (1.8694)
4. Ritz (1.8194)
5. UK (1.8132)
6. Milk (1.7331)
7. 500 (1.6564)
8. WLK (1.6550)

3B

1. Milk (0.3818)
2. UK (0.3406)
3. Stoker (0.3389)
4. 500 (0.3353)
5. WLK (0.2653)
6. Femur (0.2584)
7. Shane (0.2084)
8. Ritz (0.2079)

HR

1. Femur (1.6692)
2. Shane (1.5760)
3. UK (1.4020)
4. Ritz (1.3916)
5. 500 (1.2686)
6. WLK (1.2475)
7. Milk (1.2109)
8. Stoker (1.1191)

RBI

1. Femur (5.9501)
2. UK (5.8269)
3. Shane (5.7267)
4. 500 (5.3683)
5. Ritz (5.1420)
6. Milk (5.0106)
7. Stoker (4.9844)
8. WLK (4.7428)

SB

1. Stoker (1.3025)
2. WLK (1.1888)
3. 500 (1.0458)
4. Milk (0.9121)
5. UK (0.9040)
6. Femur (0.7573)
7. Shane (0.6713)
8. Ritz (0.6411)

BB

1. 500 (5.1412)
2. UK (4.7694)
3. Shane (4.5807)
4. Milk (4.4206)
5. Ritz (4.3561)
6. Stoker (4.3366)
7. WLK (4.2804)
8. Femur (4.2771)

SO

1. 500 (3.8298)
2. UK (4.0172)
3. Stoker (4.2472)
4. Milk (4.4604)
5. Ritz (4.7668)
6. WLK (5.0925)
7. Femur (5.4516)
8. Shane (5.6622)

Great stuff Stokes... why didn't you tell me my offense sucked...

 

[blstoker]

Great stuff Stokes... why didn't you tell me my offense sucked...

Sorry, but I didn't do the numbers until after I had been eliminated.

 

[wlk3]

Sorry, but I didn't do the numbers until after I had been eliminated.

Looking at it in raw numbers I can see it, just don't really understand still... Knoblauk & Wills are leadoff guys, Butler and Damon they're all great top of the order guys... don't you have to be a guarantee base to lead off... so how does a team with 4 instead of 2 " guaranteed" baserunners suck at getting on base...

 

[blstoker]

Looking at it in raw numbers I can see it, just don't really understand still... Knoblauk & Wills are leadoff guys, Butler and Damon they're all great top of the order guys... don't you have to be a guarantee base to lead off... so how does a team with 4 instead of 2 " guaranteed" baserunners suck at getting on base...

Because, without the fear of great power - pitchers don't necessarily pitch around them, so they draw too few walks to truly have high OBP. Wills had a career .330 OBP - Knoblauch .378 - Butler .377 - Damon .352. Not terrible, just not great.