- Thread starter
- #1
The Business Of Baseball - Forbes
That's franchise values, and they also link to another article that shows estimated revenue and income (or in the case of the Dodgers, 90 million deficit. Ouch)
Feel free to explore as much as you like, but i've got a few things that i'd like to call your attention to:
The team that most closely matched the Pirates in my view (for a bunch or reasons, some of which might not be immediately apparent) is the Orioles, who actually made about 7 million less in gross revenue in 2013. The Orioles had an estimated net income of 1.5 million and a listed payroll of 105 million which strongly suggests that the Pirates could've afford to go up to about 100 million.
The Pirates listed their payroll at 80 million in 2013 but 13 million of that was being paid by other teams (wandy and aj) by the end of the year they maybe spent more like 74 million according to one site. Forbes also lists more than 20 million dollars in net income for the Pirates in 2013, so it once again suggests that the Pirates could've spent close to 100 million without exceeding their revenues.
For 2014 the increase in revenue sharing (which ranges from 20-25 million depending upon who you ask) should be added directly into the revenue figure and can be applied in its entirety to the player payroll.
So the Pirates should be able to spend up to about 120 million this year without going over budget, according to Forbes.
Other interesting tidbits include the fact that pittsburgh had more revenue than 10 other teams (including the Brewers) and was very close to 3 others including the Reds.
That's franchise values, and they also link to another article that shows estimated revenue and income (or in the case of the Dodgers, 90 million deficit. Ouch)
Feel free to explore as much as you like, but i've got a few things that i'd like to call your attention to:
The team that most closely matched the Pirates in my view (for a bunch or reasons, some of which might not be immediately apparent) is the Orioles, who actually made about 7 million less in gross revenue in 2013. The Orioles had an estimated net income of 1.5 million and a listed payroll of 105 million which strongly suggests that the Pirates could've afford to go up to about 100 million.
The Pirates listed their payroll at 80 million in 2013 but 13 million of that was being paid by other teams (wandy and aj) by the end of the year they maybe spent more like 74 million according to one site. Forbes also lists more than 20 million dollars in net income for the Pirates in 2013, so it once again suggests that the Pirates could've spent close to 100 million without exceeding their revenues.
For 2014 the increase in revenue sharing (which ranges from 20-25 million depending upon who you ask) should be added directly into the revenue figure and can be applied in its entirety to the player payroll.
So the Pirates should be able to spend up to about 120 million this year without going over budget, according to Forbes.
Other interesting tidbits include the fact that pittsburgh had more revenue than 10 other teams (including the Brewers) and was very close to 3 others including the Reds.