D1 Waiver/Free agency period during off-season poll

[MilkSpiller22]

Maybe make a HFA clause... HFA meaning Hot Free agent... if a free agents role changes before the draft and is seen to now be a potential Fantasy starter, then that player CANNOT be taken in the off season free agency...

the rule could be amended for agreement...

I just don't want significant players to be taken in this Free agency... I don't think it is the purpose...

 

[broncosmitty]

No Free Agency during the offseason. Prior to the draft.


If there ever was a reason, it was Bandit taking over a team that was sabotaged strategically. And that was shot down.

 

[broncosmitty]

I want Blount though if it's opened.


Im calling dibs.

 

[broncosmitty]

If changed, Any playoff team should be excluded from participation in the FA offseason dealy imo.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

I want Blount though if it's opened.
I want dibs on who ever you cut to make room for him.


Im calling dibs.

 

[broncosmitty]

It'd be Riddick.

Or a coin flip between the defenses. Or Mitch.


Anybody want one of those three?

 

[HaroldSeattle]

It'd be Riddick.

Or a coin flip between the defenses. Or Mitch.


Anybody want one of those three?

Maybe Riddick or Mitch.

 

[TREFF]

I want Blount though if it's opened.

Im calling dibs.

Kicked myself SOOOO hard for that, especially when Kizor got dealt to GB..FRICK

 

[TREFF]

If changed, Any playoff team should be excluded from participation in the FA offseason dealy imo.

I actually could set that up without actually policing it

 

[broncosmitty]

Maybe Riddick or Mitch.

Hmmmm....

 

[broncosmitty]

I actually could set that up without actually policing it

It'd be a way to help teams rebuild.


How do you do it without policing it?

 

[TREFF]

It'd be a way to help teams rebuild.


How do you do it without policing it?

On fantrax, you can just limit (or not limit) each individual teams' abilities. Would just have to leave their ability to "add/claim" unmarked

 

[broncosmitty]

On fantrax, you can just limit (or not limit) each individual teams' abilities. Would just have to leave their ability to "add/claim" unmarked

Wow. That's pretty awesome. It's a decent option to help competitive balance.


I should prolly check the stuff a commissioner can do on Fantrax. Since Im a commissioner on Fantrax.

 

[Bandit]

Okay, this discussion has gotten completely freaking crazy at this point. So Milk wants a "hot free agent" which I'm only guessing we would have to vote on to see if they qualify, so that would be fun with every free agent. And now we might open this up to non-playoff teams because for some reason because teams were good enough to be in the playoffs they shouldn't be able to improve their teams in the off-season. You guys have officially gone off the deep end. I'm just changing my vote to no if this is the crazy shit we're coming up with.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Okay, this discussion has gotten completely freaking crazy at this point. So Milk wants a "hot free agent" which I'm only guessing we would have to vote on to see if they qualify, so that would be fun with every free agent. And now we might open this up to non-playoff teams because for some reason because teams were good enough to be in the playoffs they shouldn't be able to improve their teams in the off-season. You guys have officially gone off the deep end. I'm just changing my vote to no if this is the crazy shit we're coming up with.

As usual you vote on something simple, then others start up with a bunch of twists that just derail the original idea so the vote goes no, because it becomes apparent that the discussion is entering the twilight zone. Then they wonder why change never happens.

 

[TREFF]

Okay, this discussion has gotten completely freaking crazy at this point. So Milk wants a "hot free agent" which I'm only guessing we would have to vote on to see if they qualify, so that would be fun with every free agent. And now we might open this up to non-playoff teams because for some reason because teams were good enough to be in the playoffs they shouldn't be able to improve their teams in the off-season. You guys have officially gone off the deep end. I'm just changing my vote to no if this is the crazy shit we're coming up with.

Oh crap..well, for me, I was just saying it was possible, not that we should do it

 

[HaroldSeattle]

I don’t get the worrying about someone like Lynch unretiring. Besides Lynch name another example. It just doesn’t happen. Besides Lynch really wasn’t all that last year .....was he?

 

[TREFF]

I don’t get the worrying about someone like Lynch unretiring. Besides Lynch name another example. It just doesn’t happen. Besides Lynch really wasn’t all that last year .....was he?

As a Raider fan, no, no he wasnt

 

[obxyankeefan]

I don’t get the worrying about someone like Lynch unretiring. Besides Lynch name another example. It just doesn’t happen. Besides Lynch really wasn’t all that last year .....was he?

Larry Csonka


All kidding aside

The Un-Retired All-Stars: Who Marshawn Lynch joins in returning to NFL

It does happen just not that often

 

[obxyankeefan]

Right now my vote is a no. Mainly for the Lynch reason, but also because of the strategy involved.


I would be open to changing my vote if it was a WW thing to fix trades.

Or another option is doing away with the keeping a complete lineup between the end of the season and the end of the draft. But with more of a penalty for after the draft.