- Thread starter
- #1
Well the November FCS game is his fault, he could push for it to be played in September like most conferences do, but it would put him at a disadvantage since Auburn also schedules an FCS in November.Thank God. Im tired of Saban being the only one in favor of this meanwhile being the only one taking the heat for the November FCS games when it isnt his fault.
Name an FBS team that isnt playing a Conference game the 2nd to last week of season, not many....its just so much less of a headache to schedule an FCS that week.Well the November FCS game is his fault, he could push for it to be played in September like most conferences do, but it would put him at a disadvantage since Auburn also schedules an FCS in November.
Name an FBS team that isnt playing a Conference game the 2nd to last week of season, not many....its just so much less of a headache to schedule an FCS that week.
thats everyones complaint. play the non conference schedule early like everyone else.Name an FBS team that isnt playing a Conference game the 2nd to last week of season, not many....its just so much less of a headache to schedule an FCS that week.
You could play, a conference game that weekend, like most of the rest of the civilized college football world.Name an FBS team that isnt playing a Conference game the 2nd to last week of season, not many....its just so much less of a headache to schedule an FCS that week.
Exactly, which is what Nick Saban has been fighting for.You could play, a conference game that weekend, like most of the rest of the civilized college football world.
He also taste tested them.
USC plays a 9 game conference schedule and still manages to play 2 P5 OOC games a year.If they are going to keep divisions, I agree with the 9 game schedule for the simple fact teams won't go so damned long without playing a team that is actually in their conference.
If they'd do away with divisions, they could probably get to every other conference team on a more frequent schedule with an eight game schedule...and they could schedule two P5 OOCs a year.
We need a hell of a lot more cross pollination among the P5s. JMO
LOL? The SEC followed by the ACC plays the least amount of P5 teams on average year in and year out. That's a bunch of bs that teams need an 8 game conference schedule in order to schedule more OOC games with P5 teams.Both are wrong, schedule an OOC P5 opponent instead.
LOL? The SEC followed by the ACC plays the least amount of P5 teams on average year in and year out. That's a bunch of bs that teams need an 8 game conference schedule in order to schedule more OOC games with P5 teams.
For the 100th time that's neither of our faults. The week after was a bye week for both of us right before the SEC Championship, then the rest of the conference had a cow saying it was a disadvantage and the league forced us to change. Until we can get the other teams to move some games around we are stuck with this scheduling issue.Well the November FCS game is his fault, he could push for it to be played in September like most conferences do, but it would put him at a disadvantage since Auburn also schedules an FCS in November.
I’m not blaming anyone for anything. I’m stating why Alabama does not move their FCS game. I do not like teams playing and FCS opponents but Alabama is not gaining any significant advantage by playing the FCS team at that time because you are also playing an FCS opponent the same week. If you were playing LSU or Georgia the week before and Bama was playing Mercer, then there would be an advantage gained.For the 100th time that's neither of our faults. The week after was a bye week for both of us right before the SEC Championship, then the rest of the conference had a cow saying it was a disadvantage and the league forced us to change. Until we can get the other teams to move some games around we are stuck with this scheduling issue.
So go blame the pussies that whined.